The basic physics behind why these forecasts have failed.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- czechlist on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Billyjack on COP29 Preview
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Tel on COP29 Preview
The beauty of the Laws of Thermodynamics is they provide a means of showing that much hyped hysterical predictions fall into the same category as crank proposals for perpetual motion machines, and it doesn’t matter a tinker’s cuss how well credentialed the protagonist or how much money was spent on the model. If the assertion contravenes fundamental physics, it is rubbish.
Isn’t Physics wonderful, even Al Gore and Michael Mann can’t beat it. I’ll put ice free forecasts in with my “cold fusion”, just for safe keeping.
In our local paper was an article where a LLL expert discussed “The Future of Fusion.” I hope they are on to something different than they have pushed grants for over the last 70 years. The future of fusion: 70 more years of fruitless grants. I hope not, but the odds seem to be with that.
Oh what would they do when energy has no clear environmental problem other than it makes everyone wealthy?