Atlantic author says there is no connection between politics and the bombings of Tesla cars, and that they are not terrorism.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
- Tough Times For Eco-Terrorists
- EV Mandates
- “Oswald is a patsy. They set him up”
- In This House We Believe In Science
- “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL”
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Greg in NZ on Make America Healthy Again
- Francis Barnett on Make America Healthy Again
- Jack the Insider on Nobel Prophecy Update
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- conrad ziefle on Make America Healthy Again
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- conrad ziefle on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Billyjack on Nobel Prophecy Update
- arn on Nobel Prophecy Update
Progressives will always use violence even when in power.
Maybe the Atlantic is a co-conspirator. I think statistics would show that it is not vandalism because it is not spread across all makes of cars, and it is suddenly increased in the number of events compared to historical occurrences and there is a direct tie to a political figure. I would arrest the staff of the Atlantic as co-conspirators and ship them to GuatMo.
You can not say Maybe
– and then sent them to Cuba on basis of a Maybe.
It is 100% agenda driven headline like everything else Atlantic related and it is 100% politics, as everything woke related.
The case is very obvious.
Famous guy – never in trouble in all that years.
Guy enters politics – his cars start to burn. = 100% political
100% systematical and ideological agenda , just as it already was with them trying to take down twitter by demonizing Musk and cutting of Twitter from advertising.
Except that this time the big players don’t intervene directly Corporate style but use peasants and BLM strategies and just deliver bricks on the sidewalk.
1) Burn some Teslas as inflammatory inspiration,catalyst starting point .
2) Hype it up on TV to create Copycats.
3) semi -legalize this behavior by marginalizing it in media ;
as the Atlantic does here.
4) Try to ruin Tesla that way.
Most won’t boycott Tesla no matter what Musk is doing,
but noone wants to buy a car that will likely burn.
That’s the trick here.
5) Drive Tesla shares massively down.
Musk loses Billions.
Buy Tesla shares for Pennies on a Dollar,
and maybe Musk has even to sell Twitter to compensate the losses.And they have regained the Information Monopol.
Not terrorism?
Well, that depends on whether or not it is a coordinated set of attacks and arson. It doesn’t matter what the motivation is. If an organisation is paying, supporting, suggesting, justifying and/or executing the attacks, that is by definition a campaign of terror.
For example if it turns out that a rich individual organized this, or a known violent organization is calling for its supporters to do this, that is terrorists acting on instructions from a terrorist organization.
Individuals might be calling for violence such as Jimmy Kimmel did recently on national television. Enticing, advocating violence and arson which is causally-connected to results might be considered a RICO offense.
Certain groups have been getting away with so much for so long, they may be feeling they are exempt from consequences. Maybe that is changing under a new administration.
Terrorism is what they it is.
If those cars would have been burned down 4 years ago by some right wings all hell would have broken lose.
It would have been labeled terrorism and draconic antiterror laws would be on their way.
And the fossil fuel industry would be labeled as sponsors of that terrorism.
Does it matter if it is political terrorism or terrorism aimed at one individual. The smallest minority is a person. And it wouldn’t take much to prove this is a targeted attack on Tesla. Choose your reason-any will do to call it terrorism.
The attackers themselves say they are committing the crimes as a political statement. Terrorism is violence against innocents in an attempt to influence politics. Ergo, the attackers themselves admit it’s terrorism.
You have to be a special kind of stupid to write for The Atlantic.