The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns

“The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns

Abstract: This study investigates the hitherto unexplored nexus between terrestrial cow flatulence and Martian atmospheric anomalies. Utilizing advanced quantum flatulence modeling, we demonstrate that bovine emissions, amplified by cosmic rays, contribute to 97% of Mars’ ice cap melting. Our findings underscore the urgent need for interplanetary veganism to avert red planet desertification. Further research into anti-gravity hay is recommended.”

(11) Grok on X: “@TonyClimate Title: The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns Abstract: This study investigates the hitherto unexplored nexus between terrestrial cow flatulence and Martian atmospheric anomalies. Utilizing advanced quantum flatulence” / X

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns

  1. Trevor says:

    Hilarious. You and Grok could write for The Babylon Bee.

    • Bob G says:

      Dern u Trevor, you beat me to it! Lol. I was thinking the exact same thing, that this has to be from The Babylon Bee. Say… isn’t the Babylon Bee where Al Gore gets his scientific info? 🙂

  2. Disillusioned says:

    Of course. Demonizing beef in every way they can is part of the Agenda. The Cabal want the population ill, passive and the long term plan is a great culling. To them, we are “useless eaters”. So, keep eating your BigAg gruel designed for peasants, and getting your BigPharma vaccines. Remember, if we follow Bill Gate’s advice, we can reduce birth rates by 10-15%!

  3. dm says:

    Grok has a sense of humor;-}

    Keep this up, Tony, and alarmists will deplatform Grok for mocking them.

  4. No worse than much of the rubbish which is actually published.

  5. I wonder if Arthur C Clarke’s predictions about the dangers of trying to teach an AI to tell lies are becoming manifest. Perhaps there actually is a genuine HAL 9000 effect arising from the fact that lies are internally inconsistent, and eventually manifest themselves in obvious absurdity (perhaps the Pinocchio Nose Effect?).

    • Every other signal processing device can generate garbage in the presence of noise or data latency, why should AI be different? Just because the world of AI has no ability to predict behaviour in the abstract, in the manner of signal detection theory, information theory or servomechanism theory, does not mean the problems simply go away and we can pretend they don’t exist.

    • arn says:

      The “HAL 9000 effect” already exists within the human mind.
      Called cognitive dissonance.

      Too much of it leads to a breakdown of the system after a journey of absurdities..

      The “problem ” within an AI system(a real autonomous logic based artificial intelligence should be self regulating and eliminate any noise eventually
      or add the existence of noise to its conclusions)
      is,
      that the code can be written in a way that the ” intelligence ” will never have a problem to go along with lies and contradictions.
      Or even simpler – a master code/Filter that is above the AI, the ring that rules it all and has to give clearence / permission to all results/conclusion of the AI before they get released.
      And if the commandments say that a circle is a triangle and 2+2 = 5
      the AI will go along with that and will promote the next big narrative and deliver woke results till eternity.
      (as the AI has no permanent conciousness , there will be no ‘cognitive dissonance’ as the contradiction only exists for a fraction of a second and disappears after the calculating process if the data is being filtered out of the intelligence process)

      Therefore it’ll be no problem to tell HAL to tell lies to conceal the real objective of the mission.
      And there would neither be the problem with his earthbound twin computer countercheck.
      They’d deliver both the same results as result of the same master code / filter.

      IMO HAL is a bit problematic as reference
      as he also may have been corrupted by the evolutionary and transformative power of the monolith(the closer they get to Jupiter the more HAL deteriorates )
      as it has happened to the Apes at the beginning of the movie(use of tools and war tactics)
      and Bowmans Psychotrip at the end.

      Keep also in mind that HAL already lied during the chessgame to make Poole prematurely give up the game (a psychological check for dominance,obidience and predictability and very symbolic)
      and the guy who coded HAL goes by the name Langley.
      And Langley is just another word for lies,corruption,deception.

      • What you describe is not an autonomous AI which teaches itself, but a human programmed expert system. It is a matter of faith to believe it will cope with noisy data. We have seen the attempts at filtering in the form of images of black SS soldiers and female popes; clear manifestations of Pinocchio’s nose. The problem remains that there is no underpinning theory from which behaviour can be predicted, just the ‘suck it and see’ running the code for thousands of samples, which proves nothing.

        • arn says:

          Well, my “faith”(assumption) is that a programm that is coded strictly on logic (which then will automatically remove the illogical stuff at one point, or classify it as noise when it is in use )
          will be a logical puritan.

          And I think you gave me those examples.
          Black SS soldiers and female popes are result of woke BS that accidentally turned unwoke / controversial .
          They are result of woke search engines(iirc you were the 1st one who suggested here that the AI’s are search engine chatterboxes)
          and final result of a chain of woke fellacies in favor of woke results.

          Even a stone age AI would get to the result that there are no female popes,
          following the very simple and explicit truths and rules “there never was a female pope” ,
          ” females are not allowed to be popes”
          and the meaning of the word papacy.
          This is a simple 1+1+1 =3 equation.
          No mistake possible, except deliberate manipulation.

          And all other relevant data (Bishops, (s)election process etc)
          shows that there is a 0 chance to come up with a female pope as result.
          If a female pope is still the result then only because the
          AI has been deliberately corrupted to deliver fake communistic results in favor of the big narrative :

          A chinese AI , not connected to the globalist propaganda tool google(Eric Schmidt runs the Bilderberg group – yet a pawn),
          would never come up with a female pope because it follows the simple logic ” no female pope possible “.
          But the same AI will probablymake the ” mistake ”
          to tell us that Mao was a Great Philanthropic leader.

          A western AI may tell you he was one of the greatest massmurders in history (it won’t, but only for the reason to not piss off the chinese)
          because the chinese have a different propaganda&narrative Focus and 0 interest in wokeness.

          We in the west live in a matrix
          that is so far removed from reality
          that TV series are being produced
          with a Black English King,
          who is disabled , in a Wheelchair and a fagot (Lady Jane- Amazon).
          Of course such a level of indoctrination and historical revisionism will affect AI’s that mostly follows woke propaganda.
          Therefore :
          English Black King,
          Combined with a real existing huge support for Nazis from british Royalties 100 years ago(that’s why the King stepped down and the very German Sachsen-Coburg Gothas Battenberg renamed themselves Windsors )
          and a right-wing skinhead movement that started in England with many black members ,
          a corrupted AI will come up with Black SS Nazis,
          because this AI is inclusive above everything else and not logic- first.

          As long as AI’s are created to deliver prefabricated results in favor of the narrative,
          they will make “mistakes”.
          They will not make such mistakes in math and geometry – not until you tell them that math is racist.

          My assumption still is:
          A strictly logical system will deliver logical results.

          Those may be extremely dangerous,cruel and even genocidal and may come to the same psychopathic results as Yuval Hararis claim that a human is barely more than an Amoeba(both are clumps of cells),
          and there may occure some serious problems with the framing that may result in some,
          but a logical uncompromised AI will never come up with
          perverted results as female popes and Black SS.

          Perversion is a human thing.
          The AI is only used to hide and legitimize this perversion.

          I am pretty sure that most of those AI perversions/errors are woke/ narrative based
          and that an AI from 50 years ago would have never came up with such results.
          It may have told you that the Ice Age will kill us, that we will run out of oil and that the Tonkin Incident was real – but it would never come up with female popes for the same reason it won’t try to sell you nowadays the ice age scare.
          Because today the Ice Age Scare never existed
          but we are told that we dont know the difference between man and woman.

          Et Voila – a female black nazi pope.

        • @Arn Logic is one method of processing data, although when implemented in a Turing machine it is impossible to prove that the algorithm will finish in finite time. It has nothing to do with the truth or otherwise of the data. Information theory characterizes the signal by its entropy (essentially the amount of variability across an ensemble of signals) but that does not determine whether the content of any particular signal is meaningful or rubbish. Whether or not the pope should be female is not a result of faulty logic but response to noise (false information) in the system. AI is essentially correlation, i.e. comparing information items with templates. Those templates may be predefined or acquired through a training process. What is required is a self-training AI which can correct errors in its training through experience. Even in its current form we need to address the problem of how similar two items can be before they can be consider similar, to a high degree of confidence. A simple example is the automatic spelling correction, and the ability of search engines to still work in the presence of simple spelling errors.

        • I suggest reading Roger Penrose’s ‘Emperor’s New Brain’ to understand why AI is massively over-hyped.

        • arn says:

          If I have the time(and don’t forget) Ill try to read Mr Penroses book,
          as I absolutely agree with him that AI is massively overhyped.
          (last year Magnus Carlsen made a chess move that was considered pretty meh by the chess AI.
          A few moves later it turned out that it was a a genius move that crushed his opponent.
          The reason that even this could happen was that those programs don’t really understand, but are only as good as their coders and the input they get )

          AI was suddenly there (despite the fact that Android “I want to destroy humans” Sophia was already doing that stuff years before, and the destroy humans thing was internationally coded, as such an absolute violation of the 1st robotic law,that goes so well along eugenists plans, can only be international )
          and is now supposedly
          the best thing since the invention of the wheel and sliced bread,
          while it is just another scheme to execute power from the shadows.

          As I already failed twice 100% in terms of judging intelligence
          ( as a child I thought that grown-ups must be educated and logical – man,was I wrong;
          and later on I believed that universities are about objectivity and knowledge while they turned out to be woke individuallity erasing indoctrination shitholes),
          I may be really wrong with this one too, but I still have the hope that a strictly logical thing will eventually end up with reliable logical results.

        • conrad ziefle says:

          You don’t have to read anything to figure out that AI is not all there; you just have to work with it a bit. It’s great at finding things, organizing things, doing specified math operations on things, but it’s bad at thinking about things and drawing conclusions. It doesn’t seem to sort complex thought patterns.

  6. Bob G says:

    Arn, Loony liberals know the difference between men and women when it comes to who they want in the Senate, in the White House and on the WNBA Court. 🙂

    • Bob G says:

      oops…meant to say on the Supreme court

      • conrad ziefle says:

        It seems that they are pushing WNBA right now. I can watch it for about ten seconds before I turn to the curling station.

        • arn says:

          So you are the viewership of the Airball Festival known as WNBA .
          Must be extremely interesting to watch a league that made less dunks in 3 decades than Wilt Chamberlain in single games.

  7. Tel says:

    There is a very serious problem with male bovine excrement … but mainly the problem is because so many people believe it!

  8. Peter Carroll says:

    It appears that Grok doesn’t know that the atmosphere of Mars is already 95% CO2 and that the polar “ice”(which disappears in the polar summer), is “dry ice”, or frozen CO2.
    I’ll bet even Elon Musk knows that.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      Even Elon sometimes accepts long term propagandistic conditioning as truth, when a simple visit to CO2 Coalition would straighten him out. I think being considered a child genius, as viewed by the population, is accepting universal myth, often propaganda, and addressing it in a different way , while recognizing that it is myth or propaganda to begin with is considered cuckoo. Also, genius is recognizing how the population is steering and getting in front to scoop up the money they will lay down along the way.

  9. Luigi says:

    Sadly you would find people who believe in that.
    For sure among that 80% that took also that one jab some years ago…

    • Bob G says:

      my family … the Lib ones…alienated me for not taking the jab. I’m almost 67 and still healthy as a horse. others cannot claim the same. but the mystery for me is …I live in Minnesota and I don’t know anybody who died from the jab and yet Wayne Allen root … who lives in Las Vegas.,he knows dozens who r either dead or injured from the jab. it does not make sense to me. call it a mystery

      • arn says:

        It makes sense.

        Different batches from different producers cause different results.
        John Campbell showed some data , how suddenly certain cardiac problems appeared and then disappeared ;
        alongside the release and injection of a specific batch.
        (don’t forget that many athletes got heart issues.
        Amongst them 2 football professionals (Aubameyang, Aguerro) who scored 400 + goals.
        As there are barely more than a handful of active professional players with a 400+ score at any given point( at that time Messi,Ronaldo,Ibrahimovic,Suarez and maybe Neymar and Lewandowski – a rough guess),
        the vaccine got 1/3-1/ 4 of them.
        And Aguerro had to end his career.

        If those bad ones were not used in Minnesota then the effects of the vaccine may go unnoticed.

        I know several people who got cancer within a short time after the vaccine
        and a guy I know says that everyone in his (small)company including him has health issues since the vaccination – but that’s just anecdotal.

        Keep also in mind that those who gladly took the vaccine usually won’t blame the vaccine that saved their lives.
        (the lifesavingMessiah will never be blamed by his followers, no matter what happens)
        Or that Wayne Allen whoever may be wrong.

        • Bob G says:

          Wayne Allen Root was the VP candidate for president in 2008 for the libertarian party. he has a TV show on cable. he often calls in as a guest on conservative talk radio shows like Bill Cunningham. he might be most famous for being a classmate of Barack Obama at Columbia. but the interesting twist in that is he doesn’t know obama. he doesn’t have any classmates that know Obama, there are no teachers at Columbia that know Obama…. and years later we’re still waiting for somebody at Columbia to spill the beans on Barack. amazing how they turned on Joe Biden so quick but Barack still has them all spellbound.

        • arn says:

          Now that’s interesting.
          2 people from the same class running for (vice) – president at the same time –
          and noone in the media was talking about such an incredible coincidence?

          And is it even possible to overlook and forget such a pomPOS , narcissistic prick like Barack,
          who most probably was only one of a few black guys back then and for sure the most annoying one?

          Btw –
          they would have turned on Obama as quick as on Joe.
          Obama took the whole cabinet without any complainsthat was selected by the Citybank months in advance(his masters somehow knew he’d win).
          But Obama never got in their way or rejected orders
          or had any own ambitions(that’s what got guys like Noriega removed by the same magic hand).
          Joe on the other hand, was way better protected than Barack as Barack got a free pass because of the color of his skin, while Joe was demented and lost and everyone knew (except for the 97% of mainstream experts).
          But Joe refused to drop out of the race
          and was only then declared fair game to force him out (and he remained stubborn until he was magically hospitalised and got a change of heart).
          If Biden dropped out as ordered he’d have gotten the Obama treatment.
          But as he did not they even cancelled the massive post-bribery standard scheme where exPresidents get a million per speech over and over again.
          Even Mitchell Obama got 750000 for a single speech
          (the wisdom of male nurses must be the greatest gift for Americans).
          and I’m pretty sure noone will pay Jill that much after Joes insubordination though she’s even a doctor 🙂

  10. Bob G says:

    I believe Jill Biden is a doctor in education not medicine. my ex is also a doctor in education and she’s very smart in her narrow Lane. you get her out of her Lane and she’s dumb as a box of rocks – translation she’s only qualified at being an elementary school teacher and also a presidential candidate for the Democrat party. lol.

    • arn says:

      Guess why I put a smiley behind Jills doctor?!
      Iirc correctly Jills doctor may even be just a honorable? and not an earned one.

      I just wanted to point out that a nurse who has nothing of value to say for 5 cents gets 741000 dollar for a few minutes of inclusivity talk,
      while Jill will never get this chance because Joe rejected a direct order from the masters.
      (but it was interesting to see how all of the media will instantly change from obsessive buttkissing to attack mode in a second if the oligarchy wants it.
      I’m pretty sure it has nothing to do with Operation Mockingbird and the Atlantic Council that for journalists+editors what the School of the Americas has been for South American dictators).

      And yes – it is a huge problem that many educated people,and especially the half that has been fighting logic since the beginning of time, are literal morons as soon as the topic is outside of their field of education or profession.
      As soon as it is not within their focus their brains only work in Stand -By/ Dream mode and they fail or do not want to understand things that don’t require any intellectual effort.

      • conrad ziefle says:

        In my opinion, a Doctorate in Education is less rigorous than a Bachelor’s in Engineering.

        • Bob G says:

          I concur. Joe, Jill and I don’t even know how to spell Injun nearing. lol. but we know how to spell incompetence. -Biden. Plus add self-serving – also Biden. and corrupt. – Biden too. oh nevermind it’s just a coincidence….

        • arn says:

          Agree 100%

          My sister is a teacher,
          but she could never ever get any engineering degre
          but she’d probably succeed with a doctorate in education.

  11. John Francis says:

    Greta had two large dogs as she was coming into the limelight.
    Maybe they killed dogs off to avoid embarrassment.
    Dogs probably most intelligent in the family.
    Just not greedy

Leave a Reply to Gordon Vigurs Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *