Climate experts working for the government try to scare people into believing that US temperatures will become unbearably hot due to rising CO2. Hansen predicted that the US would warm 4-6 degrees by 2020.
Thermometers tell a completely different story. Since 300 PPM, measured US temperatures show zero correlation with atmospheric CO2.
But, but, but, according to the Dr Robert Browns and Dr Roy Spencers of this world, CO2 is a “greenhouse gas”.
I have a problem with a theory if the relevant variable goes up by 40% and the measured outcome shows an effect of precisely 0% (to the nearest whole number).
It is a greenhouse gas, but is already absorbing almost all radiation it its absorption spectrum.
Ah, but has the 40% of missing USHCN stations absorbed all of the fake data adjustments yet?
Heh! I think you’re on to something there TS!
Well, great Lakes finally ice free. The life spiral continues
http://weather.aol.com/2014/06/12/great-lakes-finally-ice-free-after-record-ice-longevity/?ncid=webmail22
At what level did the GH effect saturated Steve?
The knee of the CO2 curve is at about 20 PPM.
About 75 feet off the ground.
At the track in Saratoga it can be 90 degrees, at track level, on the second floor in the grandstands 85, and on the 4th floor of Turf Terrace (outdoor restaurant) it’s 75 degrees. All the IR in the CO2 band is absorbed by the first 75 feet of atmosphere.
“It is a greenhouse gas,”
But does that actually matter to the climate?
Clincher.
Reblogged this on wwlee4411 and commented:
The truth hurts.
Zero correlation, but the warmunists are convinced that they see causation! You can’t fix stupid.
GallopingCamel had an interesting point about CO2 and IR radiation.
Dr Robert Brown posted an easier to understand comment at WUWT in response to this. HERE
And there is quite a bit of discussion @ CheifIO