Rice Is Destroying The Climate

“The global food system, and the agriculture industry that supports it, could cause as much global warming as all human activity has caused since the Industrial Revolution, new research finds.

After ruminant meat, rice is the food item responsible for the most global warming. Flooded rice paddies are a breeding ground for methane-producing microbes.”

The food we eat is destroying the climate — here’s how to fix it – The Verge

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Rice Is Destroying The Climate

  1. Russell Cook says:

    — “The food we eat is destroying the climate — here’s how to fix it: STOP EATING”

    ….. and how many of the people who are the most concerned, most vocal about the Clima-Change™ crisis are going to stop eating food that comes in protective plastic packaging, delivered in diesel powered-trucks to stores that were built with materials either sourced from petroleum products or produced with aid from fossil fuel energy — food that is kept either refrogerated or at room temperature (in scorching hot / freezing cold sections of the country) through fossil fuel energy, the sum total of which is responsible for a whopping 335% of global warming??

  2. The globalist/totalitarian program is becoming increasingly shrill in its messaging. “The sky is falling! The sky is falling!” And yet they eat whatever they want and jet around the world and buy beachfront houses and laugh at all the foolish little people who believe them.

  3. Francis Barnett says:

    NOW HEAR THIS ! METHANE IS NOT A PROBLEM
    THE PEOPLE WHO THINK METHANE IS A PROBLEM – ARE THE PROBLEM !!

    “When one considers the facts it is difficult to see that there are any serious
    environmental issues with changes in atmospheric methane levels. One is drawn
    to a variety of possible conclusions: there is a woeful lack of knowledge of basic
    chemistry on the part of environmental agencies and NGOs; the available data is
    not known about or cannot be understood; or, more likely, desired ends (grants,
    publicity, public financial support, sales of publications, control) are not served
    by a consideration of facts and available data”

    Dr Wilson Flood
    https://climaterealists.org.nz/sites/climaterealists.org.nz/files/The%2520Methane%2520Misconceptions%2520published%2520version.pdf

  4. Denis Rushworth says:

    So it must be that Happer and Wijngaarden are wrong about their spectral analysis of global warming gasses? No?

  5. If we stop producing methane, we will soon return to LIA conditions, as the methane in the atmosphere will mostly disappear in a couple of decades time

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *