Sea level is about 2mm higher than it was seven years ago. It will only take 3,500 years to achieve 1 metre of rise, or 17,500 years to reach Hansen’s five metres this century forecast.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
Recent Comments
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Terry Shipman on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Jack the Insider on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
the keyword is “unadjusted”
The “waves” ARE getting higher.
PS: I think Hansen was born ahead of his time, about 117,500 years ahead of his time. Maybe after the next Glacial Cycle, during the next Inter-Glacial, he just might be right for a day or two. Today he sounds like a cracked, scratched, warped, old broken record. I’m sorry, what is it that American Taxpayers are paying him and GISS to do? I keep forgetting.
So do he and his co-workers!
So when the data is adjusted, what is it adjusted for? Are these adjustments valid or are they open to question?
The main point of the adjustments is to remove seasonal and other temporal variations. They should not change the trend however, which they do. Indicating that they are wrong.
raw data should be indicated as “unfudged”
How long are the seasonal and other temporal variations?
People in low lying areas have plenty of time to adapt, assuming they need to adapt at all. Another example of crying “wolf” when there is no wolf.