Sea level is about 2mm higher than it was seven years ago. It will only take 3,500 years to achieve 1 metre of rise, or 17,500 years to reach Hansen’s five metres this century forecast.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Disillusioned on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
the keyword is “unadjusted”
The “waves” ARE getting higher.
PS: I think Hansen was born ahead of his time, about 117,500 years ahead of his time. Maybe after the next Glacial Cycle, during the next Inter-Glacial, he just might be right for a day or two. Today he sounds like a cracked, scratched, warped, old broken record. I’m sorry, what is it that American Taxpayers are paying him and GISS to do? I keep forgetting.
So do he and his co-workers!
So when the data is adjusted, what is it adjusted for? Are these adjustments valid or are they open to question?
The main point of the adjustments is to remove seasonal and other temporal variations. They should not change the trend however, which they do. Indicating that they are wrong.
raw data should be indicated as “unfudged”
How long are the seasonal and other temporal variations?
People in low lying areas have plenty of time to adapt, assuming they need to adapt at all. Another example of crying “wolf” when there is no wolf.