Early indications for Winter 2009/10
[ARCHIVED CONTENT] Met Office: Early indications for Winter 2009/10
How did that forecast turn out?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
Recent Comments
- Bob G on NASA Sea Level
- Allan Shelton on NASA Sea Level
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
Please be fair to the Met Office Steve,surely you know what they meant. What they really truly meant was,if the missing heat is found,it could be warmer,but if the heat that isn’t,isn’t,it will still be warmer than normal. But if it isn’t warmer,it will be something else. Or something. But if skeptics drive their SUV’s,you will be doomed. Or something. Mike Mann is counting next years tree rings to advise the met office what the weather will be like next year.
They read the wrong set of runes.