Steven:
You are Cherry Picking again! You need to show the changes since the last Glacial Maximum to really see the warming. Then again if you showed the changes since the Holocene Optimum the trend is cooling and if you went back 4 million years the long term trend is cooling. I was going to use 400 million years but that also agrees with you.
I know! If you start at 1975 and show the Arctic temperature through 2000 and extend the line towards the future in a linear fashion then you can find a warming trend. If you use a location like Barrow that has increased the human provided heat sources to warm habitations that throw off waste heat you can also find a warming trend. If you throw away all the unbiased records a warming trend emerges also.
You just need to let your mind fly on flights of fantasy to understand what ou are being told. Then you also can become a true believer!
Isn’t it funny that one moment the “skeptics” are saying the temperature data is unreliable, the next moment they’re using even older temp data to try and prove warming happened once before.
Steven:
You are Cherry Picking again! You need to show the changes since the last Glacial Maximum to really see the warming. Then again if you showed the changes since the Holocene Optimum the trend is cooling and if you went back 4 million years the long term trend is cooling. I was going to use 400 million years but that also agrees with you.
I know! If you start at 1975 and show the Arctic temperature through 2000 and extend the line towards the future in a linear fashion then you can find a warming trend. If you use a location like Barrow that has increased the human provided heat sources to warm habitations that throw off waste heat you can also find a warming trend. If you throw away all the unbiased records a warming trend emerges also.
You just need to let your mind fly on flights of fantasy to understand what ou are being told. Then you also can become a true believer!
Global warming believers have something to get rabid about again:
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png
Hellooo, alarmists….. you–who……you there.
http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Arctic1880-2004_3.gif
And now it appears that Arctic temperatures were higher in the 1930’s.
That data has not been properly tortured to show the desired results.
I wonder why Hansen did not wanted us to know about this.
Isn’t it funny that one moment the “skeptics” are saying the temperature data is unreliable, the next moment they’re using even older temp data to try and prove warming happened once before.