Marc Morano sent this over
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The Great Climate Clash
Bigfork, MT, USA, October 20, 2010.
Is the Debate Over?
Follow this critical debate on AGW at ClimateClash.com
In a stunning rebuttal to Dr. Eric’s comments, Dr. Ed posted his
“3. Are we at an Impasse?”
where he shows how the Scientific Method handles all complexities and is the
only way to determine how nature behaves.
Dr. Ed’s first post reviewed “The Scientific Method.” Dr. Eric followed by
suggesting the problem of AGW is too complex for the scientific method.
Dr. Ed concludes with his challenge to Dr. Eric:
“A refusal by Dr. Eric to agree to using the Scientific Method as the one
and only method for verifying the AGW hypothesis, will be an admission of
defeat. This will be clear evidence that AGW is based upon pseudo-science
and is a fraud. The debate will be over.”
The Great Climate Clash is the highest attended debate on Global Warming
ever, and it is written so you can study it.
The Great Climate Clash will help voters decide how to vote on November 2,
2010.
Edwin X Berry, PhD
Atmospheric Physicist
www.edberry.com
American Meteorological Society
Certified Consulting Meteorologist #180
American Physical Society
American Geophysical Union
World Champion centerboard sailor
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19602-green-machine-trees-may-spell-trouble-for-wind-power.html
New $cientist Magazine says trees are bad for the environment????????????
Not in the way you’re implying, no.
Dang it, Steve! I was going to comment on some other threads, but you’ve posted so many great topics in such a short time, I can only discuss a few at a time, and now I’ve got to read this debate!……. Slow down! haha
Imagine that… the scientific method being trouble for an AGW proponet. Who would have thunk it.
Well, that wasn’t much.