Imagine the future suffering of mankind, if we turn our backs on the jealous god of carbon dioxide.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- mwhite on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- william on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
Makes a certain sort of sense.
Heretics do not conform to the dogma (consensus) of the belief structure (CAGW).
They have to ask if you believe in GW because it is not a question of fact but rather of faith. The faith must be protected so all heretics must be disposed of.
I agree that all people that deny natural ocean atmosphere weather patterns are the primary driver of climate change because by their proposed restrictions they will affect the lives of all the billions that now live on thsi planet and the lives of all future generations unless the restrictions are stopped and attempts. Those restrictions are the primary cause of the current global recession.
Orkeskes (I think he spelled her name wrong, it’s Oreskes)
Oh ya, forgot about her. A friend of mine (a woman friend) said the tone of Naomi Oreskes voice would change if she got a new kitchen appliance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio
the video Naomi Oreskes giving her now infamous speach on American denialism.
speech
PSU…. Penn State University……. Penn State University….. rings a bell,
they have a Hockey Team? ;o)
III. Conclusion
The international community does not have a word for this type of crime yet, but the international community should find a way of classifying extraordinarily irresponsible scientific claims that could lead to mass suffering as some type of crime against humanity.
Is he talking about biofuel programs? He must be.
”the effect of transforming hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tons of maize, of wheat, of beans, of palm oil, into agricultural fuel is absolutely catastrophic for the hungry people….What has to be stopped is … the growing catastrophe of the massacre (by) hunger in the world,”….it takes 510 pounds of corn to produce 13 gallons of ethanol. That much corn could feed a child in Zambia or Mexico for a year
http://www.livescience.com/environment/071027-ap-biofuel-crime.html
“When millions of people are going hungry, it’s a crime against humanity that food should be diverted to biofuels.”
–Palaniappan Chidambaram,
India’s finance minister
This newest kind of obscenity being suggested — entities are guilty just for being — is nothing new for American businesses; this is just the newest facet of the idea that business is a shameful secret, guilty by nature. Anyone participating in this vile pasttime is guilty by association. You want more money (a pay raise)? You’re guilty. This veil of concern for the earth’s ecological well-being is just pretty window dressing. Get enough people to succumb to this guilt and soon they’ll place the chains around their own necks and be willingly lead to their own slaughter.