A picture is worth a thousand words. IPCC 1990 and 2007 on the same image, at the same scale.
We have consensus. In fact we have two diametrically opposed consensus – from the same organisation.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
IPCC 1990 graph was from western Europe only and when updated with the most recent temperatures for that region shows a significantly warmer current period of warmth. You know better than this, its been shown time and time again. Why don’t you show a graph of the IPCC 1990 Graph updated with the temperatures for the region?
I’m also curious about how you superimposed the two? What is the common base period that you used? how did you align them up? I hope you didn’t do the lazy man’s way and just through them on top of each other and ignore they’re using different base periods…. You wouldn’t do that would you goddard?
You can see the axis markings on both graphs. Look closer.
we have two diametrically opposed consensus – from the same organisation.
Consensus’s can’t do that. And all consensus’s are equal. But some consensus’s are more equal than others.
Okay it’s simple, they were wrong then they were right, it worked out so well for cholesterol, ozone and ddt… oh wait….
how about eggs, butter, and salt
Steven
I wonder if you could tell us how you got them to the same scale, given that the 1990 graph has no values on the y axis.
Fred
‘Temperature Change (°C)”
Steven
But in the 1990 graph there are no values given for temperature change.
Fred