Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- GW on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
Interesting that the Met has 2 versions of the Dec 2nd “Near record temperatures in 2010” release.
One at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2010/record-temperatures
with headline “Near record temperatures in 2010”
One at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2010/pr20101202b.htm
with headline “Near record temperatures in 2010 to be followed by cooler 2011”
Ah, it now seems that the “followed by cooler 2011” page is no longer available?
Have a copy though, but what the hell.
I notice they are saying 0.52c for Jan through Oct, but their data set still shows 0.49c?
G S:
Flexible numbering plans make that possible. It is kind of like the flexible interest plans they came out with that were tied to the FED rate. These figures are tied to the desired outcome results. What ever needs to be found to be consistent with projections “Will” be found.
We can not have these people looking like they do not know what they are doing, can we? YES!