Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL”
- “EIGHT SOUTHLAND AREAS SWEPT BY FLAMES”
- The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
Recent Comments
- Jack the Insider on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- dm on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- conrad ziefle on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- conrad ziefle on The Thing Of The Past
- Timo, not that one! on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Timo, not that one! on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Francis Barnett on The Thing Of The Past
- arn on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- William on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- dm on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
Dissonance At The Met Office
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Interesting that the Met has 2 versions of the Dec 2nd “Near record temperatures in 2010” release.
One at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2010/record-temperatures
with headline “Near record temperatures in 2010”
One at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2010/pr20101202b.htm
with headline “Near record temperatures in 2010 to be followed by cooler 2011”
Ah, it now seems that the “followed by cooler 2011” page is no longer available?
Have a copy though, but what the hell.
I notice they are saying 0.52c for Jan through Oct, but their data set still shows 0.49c?
G S:
Flexible numbering plans make that possible. It is kind of like the flexible interest plans they came out with that were tied to the FED rate. These figures are tied to the desired outcome results. What ever needs to be found to be consistent with projections “Will” be found.
We can not have these people looking like they do not know what they are doing, can we? YES!