The poles are in a death spiral, but are healthier than normal as they die.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Jack the Insider on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Terry Shipman on Fact Checking The New York Times


yah! And that’s a lot of rye and vermouth!!!
More than 1000 dissenting scientists have now challenged the IPCC’s claims.
Check out some of the comments below – they really are scathing.
Perhaps Tony D would like to comment as he holds so much respect for scientists.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/08/shredding-the-climate-consensus-myth-more-than-1000-international-scientists-dissent-over-man-made-global-warming-claims-challenge-un-ipcc-gore/#more-29110
Hey Steven, even funnier, bigger lies are better!
?
This is a wonderfully instructive graph, the scales are lined up well, and I hate to be such a complainer, but somewhere in the legend or caption it should say that the red line is Arctic sea ice extent, and the blue line is Antarctic sea ice extent. It should be obvious, but it won’t be for everyone. On my screen the label “Arctic Sea Ice Extent” falls right on the blue Antarctic curve. Sorry I didn’t catch that before.
That chart boggles my undersized brain, but anything you say, Steve.