The red line represents the minimum amount of loss likely over the next month. It could melt back further than that, but probably not less.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- dm on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Philippe Jones on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
I assume that line was only drawn wrt the Alaskan side. Presumably, we can expect some losses in the Greenland Sea, for instance. I think it’d be interesting if the Greenland Sea ice remained, however, and I’d be curious as to the implications of having a stronger ice pack there this winter and how it affects flow out of the Fram Strait.
-Scott
Greenland Sea ice is all doomed ice and not really important.