Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- dm on “most secure in American history”
- Dave Burton on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
This Continues to show the Dishonset Bias in the Ice Extent Data Compared to their version of normal by the Government Funded Scienist Promoting Global Warming at http://nsidc.org!
‘ James L. Edwards (@patriotsrn1) says: ”
You beat me sort of to it.
Is NSIDC having measuring errors as their latest graph shows sea-ice heading closer to the 2007 line. That doesn’t appear to be right IMO?
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png
IMO, Those at http://nsidc.org will do whatever it takes to make this look like anything, but an anomily in the Continued Decline of the Arctic Ice Sheet!
The obvious MO is to produce Government charts that are obvious BS, then have the snot nosed cub reporters for the Washington Post and New York Times drool all over them and say that anyone who disagrees is paranoid, anti science and a tool of big oil.
How does one put a stop to this? This is worse than 1984.