Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Death Spiral Update : Sea Ice Area Still Right At Normal
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.



This Continues to show the Dishonset Bias in the Ice Extent Data Compared to their version of normal by the Government Funded Scienist Promoting Global Warming at http://nsidc.org!
‘ James L. Edwards (@patriotsrn1) says: ”
You beat me sort of to it.
Is NSIDC having measuring errors as their latest graph shows sea-ice heading closer to the 2007 line. That doesn’t appear to be right IMO?
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png
IMO, Those at http://nsidc.org will do whatever it takes to make this look like anything, but an anomily in the Continued Decline of the Arctic Ice Sheet!
The obvious MO is to produce Government charts that are obvious BS, then have the snot nosed cub reporters for the Washington Post and New York Times drool all over them and say that anyone who disagrees is paranoid, anti science and a tool of big oil.
How does one put a stop to this? This is worse than 1984.