Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
LMAO … I’m sure your hilarious sense of humor will be lost on the alarmists. The adjustment of the graph’s scale to reflect the big picture is poignant.
I detect a thickening (doubling?) of pixels near the terminus of the plot…the end is near!
For a little dab of trace gas, CO2 goes a long, long way!
Always remember; it’s the beer gas!
Cool graph Steve. Made me chuckle. Climate alarmist statisticians use mind stretching voodoo tactics to meet the ‘Agenda’. These also make me chuckle.
OMG, CO2 levels are accelerating at an unprecedented rate!! /sarc
Why did the data get so noisy after 1950 (don’t tell me, they used tree-ring proxies after that, right)?
Is it at .04 % yet?
I’m a climate alarmist statistician and I found this hilarious