Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924
Off Topic
Obama now claims his mother was not married when he was born:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obama-changes-his-story-born-to-a-single-mom/?cat_orig=us
For the past 12 years the MSM appears to have reported on global warming/climate change/climate wierding in a political science argument VS a geo-physical argument (Hence the publics understanding or lack thereof).
It would seem those with high IQ’s tend not to migrate to journalism.
If you understand the CO2 feedback/amplification factor of X3, GREAT, if not, find out what the argument is about.
If you do find out what the true argument is, you’ll also understand why climatologists will not and have not debated the subject!
Also, take note of the tropospheric height driven jet stream at the poles (much lower, wouldn’t you know) and the tropospheric elemental constituents (all of them) as they make they way higher.
What are the carbon dioxide levels at 800hPa, 500hPA, 300hPa, right on up to 10hPA levels?
What do the experts know about argon and the rest of the elemental constituents, their interactions with each other and EMF at height throughout the troposphere and above?
Ask Trenberth why he gave up his studies in the great atmospheric chemical domain a few years ago…
Isn’t it time for public to get a crash course on electromagnetic radiation (The full spectrum) and physical-chemical reactions & processes within our troposphere?
There is guesswork and then there’s bullshit, unfortunately the majority of the public get a lot of the BS!
Too much irrigation.