Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Off Topic
Obama now claims his mother was not married when he was born:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obama-changes-his-story-born-to-a-single-mom/?cat_orig=us
For the past 12 years the MSM appears to have reported on global warming/climate change/climate wierding in a political science argument VS a geo-physical argument (Hence the publics understanding or lack thereof).
It would seem those with high IQ’s tend not to migrate to journalism.
If you understand the CO2 feedback/amplification factor of X3, GREAT, if not, find out what the argument is about.
If you do find out what the true argument is, you’ll also understand why climatologists will not and have not debated the subject!
Also, take note of the tropospheric height driven jet stream at the poles (much lower, wouldn’t you know) and the tropospheric elemental constituents (all of them) as they make they way higher.
What are the carbon dioxide levels at 800hPa, 500hPA, 300hPa, right on up to 10hPA levels?
What do the experts know about argon and the rest of the elemental constituents, their interactions with each other and EMF at height throughout the troposphere and above?
Ask Trenberth why he gave up his studies in the great atmospheric chemical domain a few years ago…
Isn’t it time for public to get a crash course on electromagnetic radiation (The full spectrum) and physical-chemical reactions & processes within our troposphere?
There is guesswork and then there’s bullshit, unfortunately the majority of the public get a lot of the BS!
Too much irrigation.