Top scientists now tell us that they predicted Antarctic cooling all along.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
- Mainstream Fascism In Academia
- California Finds A New Way To Drive Businesses Out
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Color Or Monochrome?
- JeffK on AI Doublespeak
- toorightmate on Color Or Monochrome?
- Gordon Vigurs on Color Or Monochrome?
- Russell Cook on Color Or Monochrome?
- Gordon Vigurs on Color Or Monochrome?
- spren on Color Or Monochrome?
- arn on Color Or Monochrome?
- Michael Abbott on Color Or Monochrome?
- Disillusioned on Color Or Monochrome?
Based on trend from the years 1989-2012, that suggests their prediction was only out by 95% so far. That’s actually pretty good for climate science. Sometimes the opposite happens from what they predict.
It’s melting from the inside!!
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=79493
The NZ Herald quoted NSIDC Mark Serraze last week in their attempt to BS about the increased Antarctic ice coverage. Basically they’re now saying.
Apparently their Climate models predicted increased ice coverage in the Antarctic all along because of GW and the Ozone issue there. Yeah right!