If Obama immediately recognized the obvious fact that Libya was a terrorist attack, why did he spend the next two weeks calling it a spontaneous anti-YouTube demonstration.
- Obama is incompetent
- Obama is a liar
- Obama is an incompetent liar
- Crowley is a scoundrel
- Obama is a scoundrel
- Crowley and Obama are both scoundrels
- All of the above
That’s a tough one, cause #3 is not correct. He is a very competent and accomplished liar. That leaves all of the above off the table. Hmm……
Now the NY Times is claiming it was a terrorist attack and spontaneous demonstration happening simultaneously. Along with a pro-American love fest by friendly peace loving Islamist extremists going on at the same time.
No.7 sums it all up hor me.
Both Obama and Crowley should be impeached
I think in the end, Barry hurt himself with his lying answer. Now everyone is looking at his lying stupidity and timeline of his lies. Did we expect anything less from Candy? She’s a leftist, working for a leftist propaganda machine.
8. Romney’s going to win.
Obama: “We must not draw any premature conclusions that Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis is a Muslim terrorist.”
I choose 8. Obungo is a sneaking Lying Lazy Mooching Arrogant Narcissistic Illegal Muslim Commie POS who hates the US of A. Did I forget anything?
Yes, you did. He is a carefully chosen, groomed mouth piece for george soros who has been the man behind the puppet.
Obama just can’t bring himself to say the words.
Obama yet to confirm ‘terrorist’ act in Libya
by Dave Boyer, washingtontimes.com
October 18th 2012 8:25 AM
Despite numerous public events including a speech at the United Nations and two presidential debates, President Obama still hasn’t publicly and plainly acknowledged to Americans that terrorists killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans in Libya on Sept. 11.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/17/review-obama-hasnt-implicitly-acknowledged-terrori/