Climate experts tell us that climate change has accelerated, because they are criminal psychopaths.
Junk Science Week: Epic climate model failure | FP Comment | Financial Post
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
My wuwt comment:
“But if it’s colder than normal, that’s proof of warming.”
We know they say that, but just now in this video a UN climate delegate at Bonn says it so explicitly and idiotically that it almost blows your mind. Here the delegate insists that the freezing German summer weather is proof of warming. Insane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_hcz0NwtU7Q
73 models…so if even one model were below the current measured values, the models would still be rejected at a 98.6% confidence interval, assuming they are normally distributed. As it stands, 100% of the 73 are well above observations now, so I wouldn’t be surprised if we can reject the models’ results (for this metric) at a 3-sigma level, or with 99.7% confidence. Even something as “averaged out” and random-walk-like as the average global temperature anomaly is still off by a factor of two.
Graphs like the above one are, IMO, the #1 thing climate skeptics should be pointing to. Really, it’s the only thing that needs pointed to. The most basic of predictions that the entire hypthoses hinges on and they get it totally wrong.
-Scott
Just ask Phil and Gavin! Observations are consistent with model outputs! 😉 😉
The models are right. It’s just that the heat is missing. Or something like that.
Well, yes – the heat is in the oceans – so the planet is STILL warming. Don’t ask the alarmists how the heat gets into the ocean from the atmosphere; just BELIEVE THEM!
Al Gore found it! Apparently CO2 has superheated the Earth’s core…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrxC-qEHb8
If you start the temps at the same point as the mean…..the discrepancy is even bigger
But…but…but…the Arctic is melting!!!