Climate experts tell us that climate change has accelerated, because they are criminal psychopaths.
Junk Science Week: Epic climate model failure | FP Comment | Financial Post
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Ed on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Walter on Ellen Flees To The UK
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Greg in NZ on Ellen Flees To The UK
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
My wuwt comment:
“But if it’s colder than normal, that’s proof of warming.”
We know they say that, but just now in this video a UN climate delegate at Bonn says it so explicitly and idiotically that it almost blows your mind. Here the delegate insists that the freezing German summer weather is proof of warming. Insane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_hcz0NwtU7Q
73 models…so if even one model were below the current measured values, the models would still be rejected at a 98.6% confidence interval, assuming they are normally distributed. As it stands, 100% of the 73 are well above observations now, so I wouldn’t be surprised if we can reject the models’ results (for this metric) at a 3-sigma level, or with 99.7% confidence. Even something as “averaged out” and random-walk-like as the average global temperature anomaly is still off by a factor of two.
Graphs like the above one are, IMO, the #1 thing climate skeptics should be pointing to. Really, it’s the only thing that needs pointed to. The most basic of predictions that the entire hypthoses hinges on and they get it totally wrong.
-Scott
Just ask Phil and Gavin! Observations are consistent with model outputs! 😉 😉
The models are right. It’s just that the heat is missing. Or something like that.
Well, yes – the heat is in the oceans – so the planet is STILL warming. Don’t ask the alarmists how the heat gets into the ocean from the atmosphere; just BELIEVE THEM!
Al Gore found it! Apparently CO2 has superheated the Earth’s core…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrxC-qEHb8
If you start the temps at the same point as the mean…..the discrepancy is even bigger
But…but…but…the Arctic is melting!!!