They are back censoring all my comments again, after I posted a number of links to government data sources showing that almost everything the IPCC is claiming is incorrect.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Bob G on Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- conrad ziefle on Angry And Protesting
- arn on Angry And Protesting
- Tel on Angry And Protesting
- Bob G on Angry And Protesting
- william on Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- Allan Shelton on Precision Taxation
- arn on Angry And Protesting
- arn on Angry And Protesting
Can you link to an article? I’ll go ask where all of Steve Goddard’s facts went.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/27/ipcc-climate-change-report-ar5-live-coverage?commentpage=1
They are still censoring me too. I think I must have pointed out Dana’s statistical shenanigans one too many times.
I would try to help but The Graudian has me on moderation alert which I imagine is similar to Dean Wormer’s double secret probation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0cF2piwjYQ
It’s a big game Steve, Hide The Decline, Change the Data, Scare the Public and Steel their money.
You can ask a climate scientist questions on Sept 30 here. NASA posted the link on twitter.
https://plus.google.com/events/ci847lun7j8gqnfuv0unlra8504
Funny the name, created by NASA Goddard.
oops steal typo
They censor racist and homophobic comments. 😉
When it comes to working a comments thread, the other side works as a team. They know if one commenter posts twenty links then the bot is going to bin him. So twenty guys go in and each posts one link. The lone wolf ninja approach isn’t always the best way.
Just looked at that ‘sort-of’ article at the Guardian. I hadn’t realized that Al Gore runs the editing staff…
While reading it, I must admit I threw up in my mouth more than a little. Terrifying idiocy on full display.
I’ve emailed them Steve asking why your posts are disappearing at a rate faster than any supposed sea ice. These people , the left are disgusting , if the truth doesn’t fit them bury the truth.
Just heard Lord Chris Smith (hmmm wonder why he’s a lord) on radio 4 talking about all the wild weather we’ve been enduring. The man is a prat and a dozy thick prat at that.
I think it would make a nice 97% poll to find out how many climate skeptics are on pre-moderation at the Guardian.
Hmm. I also wonder how much alarmists charge to commission a typical 97% study? I wonder if it costs more if the data actually says 1.2%, or is it just a flat rate to bullshit? The marketing potential is endless. I wonder if the medical industry would be interested in a new, lower rate “volume pricing plan” like the Climate Industrial Complex seems to have adopted.
Man up. Stop whining. It’s the Guardian, for God’s sake. You should have expected this from your first comment on. Nothing in their behavior would suggest their championing of free speech.
Dana is deleting many of my comments too on this thread:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/sep/27/global-warming-ipcc-report-humans?commentpage=1
97% $$$$$ is not negotiable Hockey Schtick. It is part of the contract.