800,000 Rwandan’s were massacred with machetes, because gun control kept them from being able to defend themselves. The perpetrators were very appreciative of the gun laws in place. It made their job of killing hundreds of thousands of women and children much easier and safer.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
- Low Cost Renewable Energy
- The End Of Scottish Skiing
- Collapse Of The Gulf Stream
- “it’s occurring exactly the way we said it would.”
- “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
Recent Comments
- Thomas Robbins on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Thomas Robbins on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Peter Carroll on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Jack the Insider on Green Energy Progress
- Russell Cook on A Toast To President Trump
- Denis Rushworth on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- czechlist on A Toast To President Trump
- D. Boss on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- D. Boss on Green Energy Progress
- arn on A Toast To President Trump
East Timor in 1999 was the same. Civilians getting chopped up or shot by militants.
They needed the Australian army with some other countries to stop the massacres.
The Army had guns. If the civilians had guns it would likely have been very different.
http://youtu.be/SvjlXOcY5lg
I’m sure the 800,000 dead were grateful that no WMD were used.
Yes, I’ve used this example myself, often. They were told the government would take care of them, not to worry.
Theay HAD guns…until they were taken. They also had resources, which are also being taken. Probably just a coincidence.
Both E Timor and Rwanda were engineered under the auspices of World Socialism and the UN. We are at this very instant sending Apache gunships to Indonesia for use against their own population.
These obscure places must be assimilated…or destroyed. Either way western banks and corporations profit.
For a decent anatomy of one of these campaign, see:
http://www.amazon.com/Wish-Inform-Tomorrow-Killed-Families/dp/0312243359/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380046382&sr=8-1&keywords=rwanda+regret+to+inform+you
“800,000 Rwandan’s were massacred with machetes, because gun control kept them from being able to defend themselves.”
It is a shame that Piers Morgan will probably not read this. I can just hear him, “AH! So you agree that gun violence went down!”
I homestly think that Piers would prefer to see 800,000 people murdered with machetes than to see 800,000 people live by using guns to defend themselves. As has been said before, “A gun control nut thinks that having a woman raped and strangled with her own panty hose is ethically preferable to allowing a woman to carry a gun.”
Never, NEVER, allow a gun control nut to falsely claim the ethical high ground. They are cowards who would rather see people murdered than to allow self defense. ALWAYS tell them what they are supporting.