800,000 Rwandan’s were massacred with machetes, because gun control kept them from being able to defend themselves. The perpetrators were very appreciative of the gun laws in place. It made their job of killing hundreds of thousands of women and children much easier and safer.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- Patrick Powers on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- dm on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Charles Higley on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- stewartpid on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- arn on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Disillusioned on Time Traveling Satellites
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
East Timor in 1999 was the same. Civilians getting chopped up or shot by militants.
They needed the Australian army with some other countries to stop the massacres.
The Army had guns. If the civilians had guns it would likely have been very different.
http://youtu.be/SvjlXOcY5lg
I’m sure the 800,000 dead were grateful that no WMD were used.
Yes, I’ve used this example myself, often. They were told the government would take care of them, not to worry.
Theay HAD guns…until they were taken. They also had resources, which are also being taken. Probably just a coincidence.
Both E Timor and Rwanda were engineered under the auspices of World Socialism and the UN. We are at this very instant sending Apache gunships to Indonesia for use against their own population.
These obscure places must be assimilated…or destroyed. Either way western banks and corporations profit.
For a decent anatomy of one of these campaign, see:
http://www.amazon.com/Wish-Inform-Tomorrow-Killed-Families/dp/0312243359/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380046382&sr=8-1&keywords=rwanda+regret+to+inform+you
“800,000 Rwandan’s were massacred with machetes, because gun control kept them from being able to defend themselves.”
It is a shame that Piers Morgan will probably not read this. I can just hear him, “AH! So you agree that gun violence went down!”
I homestly think that Piers would prefer to see 800,000 people murdered with machetes than to see 800,000 people live by using guns to defend themselves. As has been said before, “A gun control nut thinks that having a woman raped and strangled with her own panty hose is ethically preferable to allowing a woman to carry a gun.”
Never, NEVER, allow a gun control nut to falsely claim the ethical high ground. They are cowards who would rather see people murdered than to allow self defense. ALWAYS tell them what they are supporting.