Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
- William on “Siberia might stay livable”
- William on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Hansen : 4-6 Degrees Warming By The Year 2010
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Analysis by a fool (Friend Of Obama Legionnaire)
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Funny how Warmologists never want talk about failed predictions in the past, only what they are now for the future. The future never ends up being now.
Wrongway Hansen is a coal train wreck.
Lately some of his defenders have been saying all of Hansen’s predictions have been accurate or understated. We need to track these back and hold them to it
Give him a break. He was only off by a factor of 10.
and a minus sign…
0.05 degrees per decade??! Battle stations!!!!
Seriously, what have these guys been smoking?
The game is up and CAGW mythology is falling apart.
http://m.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/us-europe-seek-more-climate-change-data-20130902-2szfi.html
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10201289483214330&set=o.313882415313454&type=2&theater
BOM LOLOLOL
http://reneweconomy.com.au/2013/past-year-is-hottest-on-record-for-australia-36128 Hottest Ever WTF??????????????????????/
Weather is climate again with the fake stations https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=585068041557100&set=a.171427712921137.44816.170992086298033&type=1&theater
The PDO has turned less negative this year in comparison with 2012, *because* the AMO became less positive, both oscillations are connected,
“.. the dipole anomaly [Arctic] and “AMO” are connected to the same meridional overturning modes. In reality the AMO SST fluctuations also manifest in the North Pacific and Indian Ocean Dipole regions very well..which makes sense given the hemispheric Hadley/Ferrel Cell migrations seem to pace with the AMO, if not precede them.
I think the AMO should be renamed as the NHO (Northern Hemispheric Oscillation)..because that is technically what it is. We see the effects range from shifts in tropical convection/cloud cover, to angular momentum/Rossby waves, to the latitude/strength of various Hadley Cells, to hemispheric SSTs and temperature…”
http://westernusawx.info/forums/index.php?showtopic=33725&p=651909
I believe the quick change of configuration was caused in part by the low level of ice extent in the Arctic in 2012 that permitted an increased thermal exchange between the two oceans through the N. Pole. Another important factor I believe is the strong trend for another La Nina with cooler waters at the west of S. America at the equator, forcing some warmth towards the North.
This is also the cause (I think) of the low number of Atlantic hurricanes this season (Joe Bastardi was predicting many hurricanes this season because of the strong PDO-/AMO+ configuration of last year, but the configuration changed considerably since the end of 2012).
Last year Australia was cooler consistently, under the strong PDO- regime, and this should happen again when the oscillation returns to its “normal situation”, which is presently a negative phase.
Low solar radiation levels should also force the entire “NHO” towards a strong negative phase in general in the coming years.
Obama = War and Anti Science
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/04/a-dark-future-for-science/?hp&_r=1
This is why the AGW scam is so very evil, it takes funding away from worthy recipients and squanders it on nonsense. We have enough money for real problems.