Life expectancy has steadily risen, as atmospheric CO2 has risen. This is because fossil fuels keep us warm and dry, allow for much improved health care, and keep food coming to the stores.
The implication of this is that those who want to reduce CO2, are looking to kill people. One of the fastest ways to kill off large amounts of people is to make sure that there isn’t enough energy available to heat houses during cold snaps.
Reducing the flow of the greenhouse gases that spur global warming could prevent up to 3 million premature deaths annually by the year 2100, a new study suggests.
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Prevent Premature Deaths | LiveScience
Why would a scientist ever want to look at actual data, when they can just make up mindless alarmist nonsense – and get paid for it?
h/t to Marc Morano
WHY would they want to reduce deaths when one of the main themes running through environmentalism is population control?
Reblogged this on CACA and commented:
STUDY : Lack of access to fossil fuels causing millions of premature deaths amongst the poorest of the planet http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/lack-of-access-to-fossil-fuels-causing.html?m=1
As energy prices have ‘necessarily skyrocketed’ in UK, the number of people dying from cold in energy poverty in the winter months is measured in the tens of thousands. Not a whisper from the politicians enforcing the payment of subsidies to inefficient ‘green power’. As gofer says above – one is left with the impression that these deaths are the Malthusian intent of the politicians.