Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
- William on “Siberia might stay livable”
- William on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Inconvenient history.
Anyway the climate models have proven that the 1938 and the 1821 Hurricane never happened. It was journalists at the time high on dissentry that imagined scary scenarios.
BTW, 2013 is not happening either… poor alarmists!!
Keep at them Steve your doing a great job.
So it happened once in 1821 and again in 2012. That makes it a one in 191 year event. As far as I know those were the only two events of that magnitude for NYC.
Yes, the 1938 hurricane proves there is potential for a far worse event for NYC. That and Hurricane Carol during 1954, the only two major hurricanes in modern times for the Northeast.
It looks like a once every fifty years or so, at most. Fifty miles away is irrelevant scientifically. Storms do not know where cities are built.
Without a clear understanding of how tropical storms/ hurricane form and progress anyone ever put accurate figures to the likelihood of a storm making landfall? With such a tiny database of known tropical storms/ hurricane can the likelihood be extrapolated out with a reasonable degree of accuracy?
Of course the obvious thing is that as CO2 goes up, storm intensity and frequency decline. So why are we destroying the wealth of a nation by limiting CO2 emissions?
That would be Heidi D. Klien then?