Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Inconvenient history.
Anyway the climate models have proven that the 1938 and the 1821 Hurricane never happened. It was journalists at the time high on dissentry that imagined scary scenarios.
BTW, 2013 is not happening either… poor alarmists!!
Keep at them Steve your doing a great job.
So it happened once in 1821 and again in 2012. That makes it a one in 191 year event. As far as I know those were the only two events of that magnitude for NYC.
Yes, the 1938 hurricane proves there is potential for a far worse event for NYC. That and Hurricane Carol during 1954, the only two major hurricanes in modern times for the Northeast.
It looks like a once every fifty years or so, at most. Fifty miles away is irrelevant scientifically. Storms do not know where cities are built.
Without a clear understanding of how tropical storms/ hurricane form and progress anyone ever put accurate figures to the likelihood of a storm making landfall? With such a tiny database of known tropical storms/ hurricane can the likelihood be extrapolated out with a reasonable degree of accuracy?
Of course the obvious thing is that as CO2 goes up, storm intensity and frequency decline. So why are we destroying the wealth of a nation by limiting CO2 emissions?
That would be Heidi D. Klien then?