Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
- Californians Celebrate Annual Wildfire Tradition
- June 17, 1917 In California
- New York Times : California Fires Caused By Global Cooling
- Low Cost Renewable Energy
- The End Of Scottish Skiing
- Collapse Of The Gulf Stream
- “it’s occurring exactly the way we said it would.”
- “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
- “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
Recent Comments
- Russell Cook on A Toast To President Trump
- Denis Rushworth on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- czechlist on A Toast To President Trump
- D. Boss on 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- D. Boss on Green Energy Progress
- arn on A Toast To President Trump
- dm on Scientists Concerned
- Robertvd on Green Energy Progress
- Robertvd on Green Energy Progress
- arn on Green Energy Progress
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Inconvenient history.
Anyway the climate models have proven that the 1938 and the 1821 Hurricane never happened. It was journalists at the time high on dissentry that imagined scary scenarios.
BTW, 2013 is not happening either… poor alarmists!!
Keep at them Steve your doing a great job.
So it happened once in 1821 and again in 2012. That makes it a one in 191 year event. As far as I know those were the only two events of that magnitude for NYC.
Yes, the 1938 hurricane proves there is potential for a far worse event for NYC. That and Hurricane Carol during 1954, the only two major hurricanes in modern times for the Northeast.
It looks like a once every fifty years or so, at most. Fifty miles away is irrelevant scientifically. Storms do not know where cities are built.
Without a clear understanding of how tropical storms/ hurricane form and progress anyone ever put accurate figures to the likelihood of a storm making landfall? With such a tiny database of known tropical storms/ hurricane can the likelihood be extrapolated out with a reasonable degree of accuracy?
Of course the obvious thing is that as CO2 goes up, storm intensity and frequency decline. So why are we destroying the wealth of a nation by limiting CO2 emissions?
That would be Heidi D. Klien then?