Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Climate Of 1923
- Market Volatility
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- arn on Market Volatility
- arn on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Bill on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Market Volatility
- conrad ziefle on Hottest Summer Ever
- stewartpid on Market Volatility
- William on Record CO2 Growth
- Greg in NZ on Hottest Summer Ever
McKibben Math : Five Is Greater Than 1,200
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/against-100-year-flood.html
And why would Bill McKibben even think to include human deaths in his thought processes? Isn’t it enough that perhaps. maybe, conceivably, some poley bear in a zoo somewhere in Colorado was inconvenienced? Isn’t that possibility more important than mere human life?
It was very windy at my place last night and one of my pieces of garden furniture blew over. I classify this as a twice in a year event. However, it shifted and blew over in such a way that it knocked over a large pot plant. Considering the original distance from the garden furniture to the pot plant I’d probably classify this as a 1 in 100 year event. Possibly if I email Bill he could sexy it up and attribute it to extreme weather.
you’ve got to consider the age of your house…how long that area has been developed, etc
I say at least a 1/10,000
The keep pushing their narrative.
How about “They” ….
McKibben sure is a frequent twatter.
Everyone knows gun owners fired in the air and punctured the clouds, which caused the flooding.
The twittering twits tweeted and once twits tweet they move on to tweet again, and again, and again,…
Nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a twit,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it
🙂
I’m sure he would notice the difference if his funding were as greatly reduced.
So what’s the “POWERFUL” link? I bet it comes with “multiple lines of evidence” and is very “robust”.
97% is a magic number. So apparently is 5.