Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
Recent Comments
- dearieme on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- Caleb Shaw on An Inconvenient Truth
- arn on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- Francis Barnett on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- mwhite on 100% Wind By 2030
- dearieme on 100% Wind By 2030
- DABA13 on 100% Wind By 2030
- Gamecock on 100% Wind By 2030
McKibben Math : Five Is Greater Than 1,200
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/against-100-year-flood.html
And why would Bill McKibben even think to include human deaths in his thought processes? Isn’t it enough that perhaps. maybe, conceivably, some poley bear in a zoo somewhere in Colorado was inconvenienced? Isn’t that possibility more important than mere human life?
It was very windy at my place last night and one of my pieces of garden furniture blew over. I classify this as a twice in a year event. However, it shifted and blew over in such a way that it knocked over a large pot plant. Considering the original distance from the garden furniture to the pot plant I’d probably classify this as a 1 in 100 year event. Possibly if I email Bill he could sexy it up and attribute it to extreme weather.
you’ve got to consider the age of your house…how long that area has been developed, etc
I say at least a 1/10,000
The keep pushing their narrative.
How about “They” ….
McKibben sure is a frequent twatter.
Everyone knows gun owners fired in the air and punctured the clouds, which caused the flooding.
The twittering twits tweeted and once twits tweet they move on to tweet again, and again, and again,…
Nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a twit,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it
🙂
I’m sure he would notice the difference if his funding were as greatly reduced.
So what’s the “POWERFUL” link? I bet it comes with “multiple lines of evidence” and is very “robust”.
97% is a magic number. So apparently is 5.