Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
McKibben Math : Five Is Greater Than 1,200
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/against-100-year-flood.html
And why would Bill McKibben even think to include human deaths in his thought processes? Isn’t it enough that perhaps. maybe, conceivably, some poley bear in a zoo somewhere in Colorado was inconvenienced? Isn’t that possibility more important than mere human life?
It was very windy at my place last night and one of my pieces of garden furniture blew over. I classify this as a twice in a year event. However, it shifted and blew over in such a way that it knocked over a large pot plant. Considering the original distance from the garden furniture to the pot plant I’d probably classify this as a 1 in 100 year event. Possibly if I email Bill he could sexy it up and attribute it to extreme weather.
you’ve got to consider the age of your house…how long that area has been developed, etc
I say at least a 1/10,000
The keep pushing their narrative.
How about “They” ….
McKibben sure is a frequent twatter.
Everyone knows gun owners fired in the air and punctured the clouds, which caused the flooding.
The twittering twits tweeted and once twits tweet they move on to tweet again, and again, and again,…
Nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a twit,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it
🙂
I’m sure he would notice the difference if his funding were as greatly reduced.
So what’s the “POWERFUL” link? I bet it comes with “multiple lines of evidence” and is very “robust”.
97% is a magic number. So apparently is 5.