In 2010, NASA and the press got hysterical about a chunk of ice which calved off the Petermann Glacier in Greenland.
Here is how it looks today.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- arn on Protesting Too Much Snow
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Disillusioned on Protesting Too Much Snow
- arn on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Looks a bit nippy up there, too cold for golf.
There’s a lot more rotten ice in the water now and climate change has allowed vast tracts of former wasteland to be devoted to cotton production.
LOL! Loved the “cotton production!” 🙂
It’s more normal than we thought.
Reblogged this on CACA and commented:
To Climate Alarmists, Expanding Means Shrinking http://wp.me/pPrQ9-mrp
Such a common theme now. It’s so revealing that the people who told us these things were so scary and tragic are NOT relieved to see the same processes reversing. Perhaps the spinners of these scare stories have become numb to their own fear!
No they are disappointed that Armageddon didn’t happen. They hate good news. They are liberals.
Steve – and your image is later in the melt season than the NASA pics.
The new prayer for the Alarm-warmistas –
The warmth and high concentration of CO2 hiding in the deep ocean had backradiated IR energy to the glacier which then cracked and eventually calfed. As it gets older it will accumulate a sooty layer ready for next year when it will melt.
There’s a lot of new snow in todays picture.
The current ice edge is several kilometres beyond where the break occurred in 2010 – look at ice front position relative to the most northerly valley glacier entering the fjord on the right.
Oddly enough the Worldview coastline has the glacier front even further up the fjord; adjacent to the second most northerly valley glacier entering the fjord on the right.
Once again what the Apocalyptic crowd highlights as abnormal… is really… normal…
Well done with the follow up on these hysterical claims and predictions put forth over the years..
I have asked CAGW enthusiasts, “If glaciers were getting bigger, would we see more and bigger calving, or would we see smaller and less? If glaciers were melting, would we see more and bigger calving, or would we see smaller and less?”
I have never gotten a clear answer.