In 2010, NASA and the press got hysterical about a chunk of ice which calved off the Petermann Glacier in Greenland.
Here is how it looks today.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- czechlist on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Jehzsa on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Peter Carroll on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
Looks a bit nippy up there, too cold for golf.
There’s a lot more rotten ice in the water now and climate change has allowed vast tracts of former wasteland to be devoted to cotton production.
LOL! Loved the “cotton production!” 🙂
It’s more normal than we thought.
Reblogged this on CACA and commented:
To Climate Alarmists, Expanding Means Shrinking http://wp.me/pPrQ9-mrp
Such a common theme now. It’s so revealing that the people who told us these things were so scary and tragic are NOT relieved to see the same processes reversing. Perhaps the spinners of these scare stories have become numb to their own fear!
No they are disappointed that Armageddon didn’t happen. They hate good news. They are liberals.
Steve – and your image is later in the melt season than the NASA pics.
The new prayer for the Alarm-warmistas –
The warmth and high concentration of CO2 hiding in the deep ocean had backradiated IR energy to the glacier which then cracked and eventually calfed. As it gets older it will accumulate a sooty layer ready for next year when it will melt.
There’s a lot of new snow in todays picture.
The current ice edge is several kilometres beyond where the break occurred in 2010 – look at ice front position relative to the most northerly valley glacier entering the fjord on the right.
Oddly enough the Worldview coastline has the glacier front even further up the fjord; adjacent to the second most northerly valley glacier entering the fjord on the right.
Once again what the Apocalyptic crowd highlights as abnormal… is really… normal…
Well done with the follow up on these hysterical claims and predictions put forth over the years..
I have asked CAGW enthusiasts, “If glaciers were getting bigger, would we see more and bigger calving, or would we see smaller and less? If glaciers were melting, would we see more and bigger calving, or would we see smaller and less?”
I have never gotten a clear answer.