Hansen’s most recent global data tampering can be seen below, plotted on top of his 1988 forecasts. One year ago (purple) he was well below his zero emissions scenario C – but around the end of 2012 he bumped the recent years (blue) up to get temperatures closer to Scenario C.
If this were an actual field of science, these buffoons would get laughed out of town. Not only are they cheating, but even the tampered data completely wrecks their theory.
CRATER LAKE — Crater Lake received a record-smashing 8 inches of snow in 24 hours Tuesday into Wednesday, the National Weather Service reported.
More than one month ahead of schedule, the frosty blanket made its earliest appearance since 1986, when snow fell a week earlier on Sept. 18. Before that, the earliest appearance of a winter wonderland at Crater Lake was Sept. 24, 1948.
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130926/NEWS/309260314
Even New Zealand has skeptics who talk sense.
http://youtu.be/hgaeyMa3jyU
Steve – You don’t get it. They make the data adjustments slowly in the hope people don’t notice. They will adjust the data several more times in the next few years in time for AR6 (if IPCC even exists by then).
All they need to do is fool the next graduating class. We will be gone before long, and history will be rewritten without anyone being the wiser.
This is “progress”.
After predicting global warming to bring vineyards and no more snow to Britain, the IPCC now conclude Britain’s climate could get cooler over the next 80 years.
No wonder the IPCC needs to produce a new report every few years. They simply observe what happens, disregard opposing claims they previously made and predict new claims based on recent events. Hindsight climate casting. Climate scientists are a cross breed of evangelist and fraudster, the ultimate con artist.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10337064/IPCC-report-Britain-could-cool-if-Gulf-Stream-slows.html
We’ve always been at war with Oceania.
Steve:
NOONE who’s anyone who publishes on climate uses GISS anymore. Unless its top show how OFF BASE they have gotten. I haven’t seen any except non-reviewed PNAS articles even referring to DumbA Hansen’s temps. Only the media reference him, and that’s only because they have brain problems
Carbon market slowly coming back: http://www.renewable-energy-industry.com/stocks/index.php?changeLang=en_GB
Click on 5 years (5J) to see hockey stick graph.
You are simply verifying what Hansen said in 2003-
“As we shall see, the small forces that drove millennial climate changes are now overwhelmed by human forcings.”
Hansen et al., 2003 activist bulletin, Columbia University
He reiterated this in 2013-
“The hardest part is trying to influence the nature of the measurements obtained, so that the key information can be obtained.”
Excerpt from Hansen’s bio at NASA GISS website, 2013
Most people thought he was talking about CO2 and UHI and cow burps and making accurate measurements of meaningful parameters.
What a bunch of suckers we were!
“C” stamds for cheating. But even cheating is doing them little good at this point.