NOAA warns Arctic ice is melting has reached new ‘striking’ record | The Raw Story
The 2013 record is a record gain in ice, not a record loss of ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Gamecock on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- dearieme on COP29 Preview
- Greg in NZ on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on UK Labour To Save The Planet
- Tel on UK Labour To Save The Planet
Meanwhile, the boys are back in Vancouver, making themselves out as modern heroes and doing the local news circuit.
http://globalnews.ca/video/820183/modern-day-explorers-traverse-the-arctic-for-climate-change
So they left their boat to rot in Cambridge Bay and are desperately trying to monetize their poorly planned misadventure.
Such wonderfully modern environmentalists. I can smell their morally superior shit from here.
Nice try, but your lies are too obvious.
That graph is of anomalies, not ice area. In other words it is the change from some defined average, not the change in overall ice area. If the area of the icea had been shrinking year after year by huge amounts, one year of growth that doesn’t even replace all the area lost in previous years does not mean that the area is itself greater than previous years. It just means some of the losses have been regained.
Look closely and you will see that the amount gained in 2013, is not even as much as the amount lost in the period 2007-2012. Therefore overall ice area must be lower than before 2007.
You’re a liar or a fool, and only fools would believe you.
You can’t possibly be as stupid as you pretend to be. Only a complete moron would believe that a record gain in ice since last year is a record loss. Get a brain transplant.
Should we explain the graph to him, or let him try again on his own?
Maybe somebody should explain to the lad Karmakaze that a large portion of the Arctic Sea Ice melts every summer, (not all of it of course) and then it magically refreezes every winter. The amount of ice lost in the summer is therefore fully renewed every in full, every winter…..The cumulative total ice loss is near zero at it’s maximum extent….
So, harsh cold arctic summer is now a new record of ice melt therefore a confimation of global warming ?
Only one explanation to such a nonsense :
The stupid, it burns.