NOAA warns Arctic ice is melting has reached new ‘striking’ record | The Raw Story
The 2013 record is a record gain in ice, not a record loss of ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
- Blinken Not Happy Yet
- Chief Executive Kamala
- “Investigated And Discredited”
- Ice-Free Arctic Warning
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Woke Grok
- Luigi on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Greg in NZ on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- conrad ziefle on Woke Grok
- conrad ziefle on Maldives Underwater By 2050
- arn on Woke Grok
- Tommyb on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Archie on Woke Grok
- Gamecock on Woke Grok
- arn on Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
Meanwhile, the boys are back in Vancouver, making themselves out as modern heroes and doing the local news circuit.
http://globalnews.ca/video/820183/modern-day-explorers-traverse-the-arctic-for-climate-change
So they left their boat to rot in Cambridge Bay and are desperately trying to monetize their poorly planned misadventure.
Such wonderfully modern environmentalists. I can smell their morally superior shit from here.
Nice try, but your lies are too obvious.
That graph is of anomalies, not ice area. In other words it is the change from some defined average, not the change in overall ice area. If the area of the icea had been shrinking year after year by huge amounts, one year of growth that doesn’t even replace all the area lost in previous years does not mean that the area is itself greater than previous years. It just means some of the losses have been regained.
Look closely and you will see that the amount gained in 2013, is not even as much as the amount lost in the period 2007-2012. Therefore overall ice area must be lower than before 2007.
You’re a liar or a fool, and only fools would believe you.
You can’t possibly be as stupid as you pretend to be. Only a complete moron would believe that a record gain in ice since last year is a record loss. Get a brain transplant.
Should we explain the graph to him, or let him try again on his own?
Maybe somebody should explain to the lad Karmakaze that a large portion of the Arctic Sea Ice melts every summer, (not all of it of course) and then it magically refreezes every winter. The amount of ice lost in the summer is therefore fully renewed every in full, every winter…..The cumulative total ice loss is near zero at it’s maximum extent….
So, harsh cold arctic summer is now a new record of ice melt therefore a confimation of global warming ?
Only one explanation to such a nonsense :
The stupid, it burns.