During 2006, the Sun’s “Conveyor Belt” was both the slowest and fastest on record – at the same time.
2006 : record slow
2005-2010 : record fast
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Francis Barnett on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Terry Shipman on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
where do you find these things??…..it’s priceless!!!!!!
The Sun is not a fusion reactor.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2013/09/04/electric-sunbeams-2/
So then, where does the radiant energy come from, and how are elements heavier than hydrogen created? What is the source of the electric field?
What then causes a supernova?
There was no Big Bang .
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2013/10/10/a-new-look-at-near-neighbors-part-one/
Dr. John B: The Sun’s radiant energy comes from neutron repulsion in the solar core – the same source of energy that was released from cores of uranium and plutonium to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 & 9 Aug 1945
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Synopsis.pdf
That is gold.
Dr Bruce says – “The Sun is a discharge phenomenon”.
No shit Sherlock! I think Dr Bruce needs some EST to clear out the static discharge and get his brain working again.
While NASA is busy altering past data and massaging Muslim egos, real rocket scientists are leaving to actually work on rocket technology and innovation.
http://on.aol.com/video/nonprofit-program-building-homemade-rocketship-517968056?hp=1&playlist=127155&icid=maing-grid7%7Chp-desktop%7Cdl10%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D390146
Some folks defend Hathaway as just a hard-working NASA guy who’s dealing with a really complex issue – but he’s always doing his best in search of The Truth about the Sun.
I don’t buy it. Any scientist worth his salt would freely acknowledge past mistakes and failures, rather than covering his butt with serial press-releases. I could be wrong, but actions speak louder than words
I agree. See information posted below.
Not too long ago I had the temerity to criticize on WUWT Hathaway’s 2006 predictions. Leif Svalgaard jumped my case, defending Hathaway’s work as an example of a scientist learning from his mistakes. Who am I to argue with a Stanford physics prof?
I think Svalgaard is over-rated as well.
All he does is repeat “there is no correlation between solar activity and temperature” ad infinitum. But he never offers any evidence to counter the numerous parallels between rates of solar change and temperature.
Leif is about to have his lunch handed to him in the next decade, which will be undeniably colder than the last three decades
I agree. Just ask Leif Svalgaard to address the experimental OBSERVATIONS that Dr. David Hathaway ignored:
http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts/gong-2002.pdf
Thanks for the quotes from Dr. David Hathaway.
I encountered Dr. Hathaway in the summer of 2002 when he said the Sun cannot be mostly iron.
http://www.omatumr.com/upi2002.html
That fall I traveled to the Big Bear Observatory to confront him with observations he had ignored:
http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts/gong-2002.pdf
I later discovered on pages 153-154 of Fred Hoyle’s autobiography [1] that Hoyle, Sir Eddington, and most astronomers believed the Sun was mostly iron until 1946, when the model of hydrogen-filled stars was adopted without discussion or debate.
1. Home Is Where the Wind Blows (University Science Books, April 1, 1994) 441 pp: http://www.amazon.com/Home-Where-Wind-Blows-Cosmologists/dp/093570227X
In 1995, the Galileo probe of Jupiter confirmed severe solar mass-fractionation and the Sun’s iron-rich interior. NASA hid the data until 1998, when a CSPAN new video captured images of Dr. Goldin’s belated releasing the data:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3VIFmZpFco
“Oh what a tangled web we weave
when first we practice to deceive”