Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
What do the numbers on the y-axis represent? 7000 mm above what?
To get a clearer picture of sea level trends maybe they should start measuring it in angstroms.
Maybe even Planck length…
I get it that the sea, as far we can see with our eyes anyway, hasn’t risen in decades in Oregon, Malibu, Manhattan, Australia, the Mediterranean, but everywhere else it’s been rising like gangbusters. That makes sense. Water is piling up. We know this because of all the cities and island nations that have been recently submerged by the merciless sea. /s
“Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. ” -Noel Brown, ex UNEP Director, 1989
“[in twenty years (2008)] the West Side Highway (and thus much of Manhattan) will be under water.” -James Hansen, 1988, NASA
Obviously this is raw data and not yet adjusted. After adjustment you’ll see the sea level rise. That data needs adjustment!
Yes. Unadjusted data is obscene. Put some pants on it, make it behave, so we don’t have to worry where it’s been (“I sense terrible cooties in the data, Dr., and a bad attitude. Do you want me to adjust it?”–alarmist in a dominatrix costume, brandishing a whip… That is what’s REALLY making them insane: sexual control fantasies).