Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Gordon Vigurs on Back To The Future
No Sea Level Rise In Oregon For Over 40 Years
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
What do the numbers on the y-axis represent? 7000 mm above what?
To get a clearer picture of sea level trends maybe they should start measuring it in angstroms.
Maybe even Planck length…
I get it that the sea, as far we can see with our eyes anyway, hasn’t risen in decades in Oregon, Malibu, Manhattan, Australia, the Mediterranean, but everywhere else it’s been rising like gangbusters. That makes sense. Water is piling up. We know this because of all the cities and island nations that have been recently submerged by the merciless sea. /s
“Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. ” -Noel Brown, ex UNEP Director, 1989
“[in twenty years (2008)] the West Side Highway (and thus much of Manhattan) will be under water.” -James Hansen, 1988, NASA
Obviously this is raw data and not yet adjusted. After adjustment you’ll see the sea level rise. That data needs adjustment!
Yes. Unadjusted data is obscene. Put some pants on it, make it behave, so we don’t have to worry where it’s been (“I sense terrible cooties in the data, Dr., and a bad attitude. Do you want me to adjust it?”–alarmist in a dominatrix costume, brandishing a whip… That is what’s REALLY making them insane: sexual control fantasies).