Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
The holy grail….IPCC
just said that there’s nothing to worry about
I waiting to see how long it takes them to turn on the IPCC
Fine, sober discussion Steve.
There is no question that global warming science is driven by politics. There certainly isn’t any actual science behind it.
The climate science DEBATE is driven by politics, as is the media promulgation of the “consensus” alarmism. The global warming science itself is driven by general scientific incompetence, and incompetence alone, among the supposed experts, lukewarmers and alarmists alike. There are no competent climate scientists, and there is no valid climate science–it is a failed science (unless and until they all accept the Venus/Earth temperatures comparison I did 3 years ago–and my interpretation of it–as the definitive correction to the current bad consensus theories). See my “Don’t Tell the Experts” post, for example, or “The True Situation in Climate Science” (both have links to the original Venus/Earth comparison I performed–and which any student of climate, or “expert”, could have done at any time in the last 20 years, but did not).
Do Wuebbles tried the same Venus comparison with me four years ago, and then had to admit that he was wrong to do so.
That would explain why skeptics were barred from authoring any chapters of AR5.
So what caused The Nutter’s revelation?
Nothing. He had the right words in the wrong order. Like his brain.