Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
The holy grail….IPCC
just said that there’s nothing to worry about
I waiting to see how long it takes them to turn on the IPCC
Fine, sober discussion Steve.
There is no question that global warming science is driven by politics. There certainly isn’t any actual science behind it.
The climate science DEBATE is driven by politics, as is the media promulgation of the “consensus” alarmism. The global warming science itself is driven by general scientific incompetence, and incompetence alone, among the supposed experts, lukewarmers and alarmists alike. There are no competent climate scientists, and there is no valid climate science–it is a failed science (unless and until they all accept the Venus/Earth temperatures comparison I did 3 years ago–and my interpretation of it–as the definitive correction to the current bad consensus theories). See my “Don’t Tell the Experts” post, for example, or “The True Situation in Climate Science” (both have links to the original Venus/Earth comparison I performed–and which any student of climate, or “expert”, could have done at any time in the last 20 years, but did not).
Do Wuebbles tried the same Venus comparison with me four years ago, and then had to admit that he was wrong to do so.
That would explain why skeptics were barred from authoring any chapters of AR5.
So what caused The Nutter’s revelation?
Nothing. He had the right words in the wrong order. Like his brain.