Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
The holy grail….IPCC
just said that there’s nothing to worry about
I waiting to see how long it takes them to turn on the IPCC
Fine, sober discussion Steve.
There is no question that global warming science is driven by politics. There certainly isn’t any actual science behind it.
The climate science DEBATE is driven by politics, as is the media promulgation of the “consensus” alarmism. The global warming science itself is driven by general scientific incompetence, and incompetence alone, among the supposed experts, lukewarmers and alarmists alike. There are no competent climate scientists, and there is no valid climate science–it is a failed science (unless and until they all accept the Venus/Earth temperatures comparison I did 3 years ago–and my interpretation of it–as the definitive correction to the current bad consensus theories). See my “Don’t Tell the Experts” post, for example, or “The True Situation in Climate Science” (both have links to the original Venus/Earth comparison I performed–and which any student of climate, or “expert”, could have done at any time in the last 20 years, but did not).
Do Wuebbles tried the same Venus comparison with me four years ago, and then had to admit that he was wrong to do so.
That would explain why skeptics were barred from authoring any chapters of AR5.
So what caused The Nutter’s revelation?
Nothing. He had the right words in the wrong order. Like his brain.