Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
The holy grail….IPCC
just said that there’s nothing to worry about
I waiting to see how long it takes them to turn on the IPCC
Fine, sober discussion Steve.
There is no question that global warming science is driven by politics. There certainly isn’t any actual science behind it.
The climate science DEBATE is driven by politics, as is the media promulgation of the “consensus” alarmism. The global warming science itself is driven by general scientific incompetence, and incompetence alone, among the supposed experts, lukewarmers and alarmists alike. There are no competent climate scientists, and there is no valid climate science–it is a failed science (unless and until they all accept the Venus/Earth temperatures comparison I did 3 years ago–and my interpretation of it–as the definitive correction to the current bad consensus theories). See my “Don’t Tell the Experts” post, for example, or “The True Situation in Climate Science” (both have links to the original Venus/Earth comparison I performed–and which any student of climate, or “expert”, could have done at any time in the last 20 years, but did not).
Do Wuebbles tried the same Venus comparison with me four years ago, and then had to admit that he was wrong to do so.
That would explain why skeptics were barred from authoring any chapters of AR5.
So what caused The Nutter’s revelation?
Nothing. He had the right words in the wrong order. Like his brain.