Population Control Extremists: Get Rid of People Causing Global Warming | LifeNews.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- arn on Protesting Too Much Snow
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Disillusioned on Protesting Too Much Snow
And of course these exterminationists are at the front of the line volunteering to be eliminated, right?
No, of course not. They are the enlightened among us and must be preserved at all costs. It’s us unenlightened cattle who need to be slaughtered, for their [imaginary] benefit.
I don’t understand why we have to take any measures to control the population. If I understand the AGW hypothesis correctly, a warming world will result in more catastrophic climatic events, which will end up killing the poor and other vulnerable people. Logically, one would think people haters and AGW believers would want more carbon emissions so that more people would be killed off faster.
Proper response to the exterminationalists:
“You go first, if I don’t see any improvement in 20 years or so, maybe I’ll join you.”
Problem is, there would be immediate climatological improvement. Without these “alarmists” shouting their “the sky is falling, the sky is falling” BS all the time, life would be ever so much more pleasant.*
.
* Not to mention the fact that I wouldn’t miss these grant-feeding, tax-parasites at all.
I vote for the people who are causing global warming by fudging data, adjusting temperatures in databases, and changing sea level data measured by satellites, getting rid of those people would be a good start and “they’d none of them be missed…”
http://youtu.be/DOzNAKPCR80
How come these freaks always demand women bear the brunt of responsibility for birth control? Last I heard, men are 50% responsible for pregnancies.
Time for you men to ‘man up.’ So to speak. Snip, snip!
I heard it doesn’t hurt … much.
Okay, so the folks who keep coming up with ponzi schemes want to reduce population growth.
All leftists/warmists want to their utopian world, but none want to die.