Population Control Extremists: Get Rid of People Causing Global Warming | LifeNews.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- dearieme on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- Hank Phillips on Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Hank Phillips on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Hank Phillips on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Hank Phillips on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- arn on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
And of course these exterminationists are at the front of the line volunteering to be eliminated, right?
No, of course not. They are the enlightened among us and must be preserved at all costs. It’s us unenlightened cattle who need to be slaughtered, for their [imaginary] benefit.
I don’t understand why we have to take any measures to control the population. If I understand the AGW hypothesis correctly, a warming world will result in more catastrophic climatic events, which will end up killing the poor and other vulnerable people. Logically, one would think people haters and AGW believers would want more carbon emissions so that more people would be killed off faster.
Proper response to the exterminationalists:
“You go first, if I don’t see any improvement in 20 years or so, maybe I’ll join you.”
Problem is, there would be immediate climatological improvement. Without these “alarmists” shouting their “the sky is falling, the sky is falling” BS all the time, life would be ever so much more pleasant.*
.
* Not to mention the fact that I wouldn’t miss these grant-feeding, tax-parasites at all.
I vote for the people who are causing global warming by fudging data, adjusting temperatures in databases, and changing sea level data measured by satellites, getting rid of those people would be a good start and “they’d none of them be missed…”
http://youtu.be/DOzNAKPCR80
How come these freaks always demand women bear the brunt of responsibility for birth control? Last I heard, men are 50% responsible for pregnancies.
Time for you men to ‘man up.’ So to speak. Snip, snip!
I heard it doesn’t hurt … much.
Okay, so the folks who keep coming up with ponzi schemes want to reduce population growth.
All leftists/warmists want to their utopian world, but none want to die.