Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- dearieme on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mike Peinsipp on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mac on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- mwhite on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Denis Rushworth on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- D. Boss on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
they are so stupid…they don’t even know they are stupid
True .. check out his comment in a later post:
“Global warming does not mean that there will be a steady progession to a warmer climate in all parts of the world.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/fishermen/the-tipping-points-weather-channel_n_4098382_292575682.html
Some of these people must be off their meds!
“Reputable peer-reviewed journal”
Good luck with that…….
8 fans vs. 1057. Yes, that’s Huffington Post, allright. So many lemmings, so little time to run off the cliff.
Peer reviewed journal means a journal by and for people who receive grants to say global warming exists and want to get paid even more to say it is worse than we think. If they say it is less than we think, who would pay them for needless additional studies?
What successful predictions has the climate science community made? What I am suggesting is that there is more to calling yourself a scientist and wearing a lab coat. You should have some sort of successful track record for your field you can refer back to.
Are people supposed to create “peer reviewed” studies to state that everything is normal? Seems like the burden for proof would be on the people claiming that the world was going to end by 2047 – 2100.
These people have been trained to reflexively utter “peer reviewed” like so many parrots as if that is proof of something.
The so-called “climatologists” scamming the taxpayers with their global warming scare story should be prosecuted for fraud and hauled off to the hoosegow. What a greedy bunch of self-serving crackpots. There hasn’t been any global warming in 17 years. Temperatures have leveled off and are beginning to decline, despite increases in atmospheric CO2 (most of it produced from natural sources).