Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Recent Comments
- arn on “a persistent concern”
- Margaret Smith on “a persistent concern”
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
- conrad ziefle on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Big Pharma Sales Tool
- gordon vigurs on The Other Side Of The Pond
- arn on The Other Side Of The Pond
they are so stupid…they don’t even know they are stupid
True .. check out his comment in a later post:
“Global warming does not mean that there will be a steady progession to a warmer climate in all parts of the world.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/fishermen/the-tipping-points-weather-channel_n_4098382_292575682.html
Some of these people must be off their meds!
“Reputable peer-reviewed journal”
Good luck with that…….
8 fans vs. 1057. Yes, that’s Huffington Post, allright. So many lemmings, so little time to run off the cliff.
Peer reviewed journal means a journal by and for people who receive grants to say global warming exists and want to get paid even more to say it is worse than we think. If they say it is less than we think, who would pay them for needless additional studies?
What successful predictions has the climate science community made? What I am suggesting is that there is more to calling yourself a scientist and wearing a lab coat. You should have some sort of successful track record for your field you can refer back to.
Are people supposed to create “peer reviewed” studies to state that everything is normal? Seems like the burden for proof would be on the people claiming that the world was going to end by 2047 – 2100.
These people have been trained to reflexively utter “peer reviewed” like so many parrots as if that is proof of something.
The so-called “climatologists” scamming the taxpayers with their global warming scare story should be prosecuted for fraud and hauled off to the hoosegow. What a greedy bunch of self-serving crackpots. There hasn’t been any global warming in 17 years. Temperatures have leveled off and are beginning to decline, despite increases in atmospheric CO2 (most of it produced from natural sources).