Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
they are so stupid…they don’t even know they are stupid
True .. check out his comment in a later post:
“Global warming does not mean that there will be a steady progession to a warmer climate in all parts of the world.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/fishermen/the-tipping-points-weather-channel_n_4098382_292575682.html
Some of these people must be off their meds!
“Reputable peer-reviewed journal”
Good luck with that…….
8 fans vs. 1057. Yes, that’s Huffington Post, allright. So many lemmings, so little time to run off the cliff.
Peer reviewed journal means a journal by and for people who receive grants to say global warming exists and want to get paid even more to say it is worse than we think. If they say it is less than we think, who would pay them for needless additional studies?
What successful predictions has the climate science community made? What I am suggesting is that there is more to calling yourself a scientist and wearing a lab coat. You should have some sort of successful track record for your field you can refer back to.
Are people supposed to create “peer reviewed” studies to state that everything is normal? Seems like the burden for proof would be on the people claiming that the world was going to end by 2047 – 2100.
These people have been trained to reflexively utter “peer reviewed” like so many parrots as if that is proof of something.
The so-called “climatologists” scamming the taxpayers with their global warming scare story should be prosecuted for fraud and hauled off to the hoosegow. What a greedy bunch of self-serving crackpots. There hasn’t been any global warming in 17 years. Temperatures have leveled off and are beginning to decline, despite increases in atmospheric CO2 (most of it produced from natural sources).