Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
Recent Comments
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Reid on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Robertvd on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- BenV on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
Daily Archives: June 24, 2014
How Many Climate Scientists Understand Radiative Transfer Models?
Radiative transfer models are at the core of climate models. Only a small handful of people are familiar with how they work, or what they say about CO2 sensitivity. Very few people passed off by the IPCC as climate experts … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
15 Comments
Understanding Peer-Review
U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming
Posted in Uncategorized
11 Comments
42% Of Sea Level Rise Is Due To Groundwater Loss
We find that, together, unsustainable groundwater use, artificial reservoir water impoundment, climate-driven changes in terrestrial water storage and the loss of water from closed basins have contributed a sea-level rise of about 0.77?mm?yr?1 between 1961 and 2003, about 42% of the observed … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
8 Comments
No, The Adjustments Are Not Acceptable
One popular claim about USHCN adjustments is that they are “peer-reviewed” and thus sound. This is complete nonsense. What is peer-reviewed are a couple of papers outlining potential issues impacting temperature readings and proposed remedies. It is like saying that a piece … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
14 Comments