Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Independent on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
Daily Archives: June 24, 2014
How Many Climate Scientists Understand Radiative Transfer Models?
Radiative transfer models are at the core of climate models. Only a small handful of people are familiar with how they work, or what they say about CO2 sensitivity. Very few people passed off by the IPCC as climate experts … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
15 Comments
Understanding Peer-Review
U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming
Posted in Uncategorized
11 Comments
42% Of Sea Level Rise Is Due To Groundwater Loss
We find that, together, unsustainable groundwater use, artificial reservoir water impoundment, climate-driven changes in terrestrial water storage and the loss of water from closed basins have contributed a sea-level rise of about 0.77?mm?yr?1 between 1961 and 2003, about 42% of the observed … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
8 Comments
No, The Adjustments Are Not Acceptable
One popular claim about USHCN adjustments is that they are “peer-reviewed” and thus sound. This is complete nonsense. What is peer-reviewed are a couple of papers outlining potential issues impacting temperature readings and proposed remedies. It is like saying that a piece … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
14 Comments