Here is a stunner.
I plotted the USHCN V2.5 adjusted data below, distinguishing between data which was adjusted from raw data (red) and completely fake data (blue.) It turns out that essentially all reported warming since 1990 in the US, is due to fake data manufactured without any underlying thermometer data. The “record warm” year of 2012 was manufactured with two degrees of completely fake data.
Alarmists claim that the adjustments are necessary due to TOBS, etc. – but that isn’t what is producing the warming since 1990. The adjusted data shows almost no warming. The warming comes from fake data.
The fake data is diverging from the adjusted data at seven degrees per century.
The biggest scientific fraud in history.
Steven,
I just love your blog; keep it up, as they say.
BTW, I am a scientist.
Harry
Thank you!
Yes, Steven, George Orwell correctly sensed what was coming at us in 1946 when he started writing “Nineteen Eighty-Four!”
Did Orwell knew that Fred Hoyle was also writing papers in 1946 that would change “consensus scientific opinions” on the internal composition of the Sun, from mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946?
Manuel, did you know that Nik, a guy/gal, from NYC has stolen all the iron from the Sun? Sad, but he/she is using the proceeds to start a blog of his/her own. You may want to join him/her, as you two have so much in common.
(And, I don”t even want to tell you about the horror stories before 1946. Don’t ask, don’t tell.)
Thread bomber.
Actually, this could be huge. I was involved in AWOS/ASOS measurements 20 years ago. (I inspected airports). In those days, the “correct” temps were relayed to computers within seconds.
There is no excuse for adjusting historical data, other than PC (Perversion and Corruption).
BINGO!
The corrections are based on thinking our ancestors were total idiots when what we have are present day idiots.
Try using Climatastrology methods in an FDA audited lab and you will find your @$$ in jail.
“@$$” – let me guess – emailed bit coins?
Unless your company is a friend of the FDA. Then it’s perfectly fine to do this sort of thing.
Estimated Data is Warming Data
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/estimated/
Excellent work. Thanks!
So after all the hoopla and claptrap over Man-Made CO2, there isn’t much warming to speak of other than Mannian data fudging. What a waste of time, money and talent. Heartbreaking watching our beautiful civilization crumble.
I have been collecting feathers….
I will Steve will bring the tar and we will call it a party!
Sounds good!
Tar Party.
Good one.
I wonder if that could be worked into a t-shirt?
Forget the Tea Party. I want a Tar Party!
IMAGE
And send one to each of the 545 people that are responsible for this mess.
Who’s going to provide the triangular split Chestnut fence rail on which to ride the guilty out of town? A triangular split fence rail I am told is supposed to create an awesome “Wedgy.”
Just to prove that some of our ancestors were made from much sterner stuff here is a portion of a 1774 account of the American Revolution from the view point of a Loyalist.
“In November 1774, David Dunbar of Halifax aforesaid, being an Ensign in the Militia, a Mob headed by some of the Select Men of the Town, demand[ed] his Colors [flags] of him. He refused, saying, that if his commanding Officer demanded them he should obey, otherwise he would not part with them: upon which they broke into his House by Force & dragged him out. They had prepared a sharp Rail to set him upon;12 & in resisting them they seized him (by his private parts) & fixed him upon the Rail, & was held on it by his Legs & Arms, & tossed up with Violence & greatly bruised so that he did not recover for some Time. They beat him, & after abusing him about two Hours he was obliged, in Order to save his Life, to give up his Colors…..”
February 1775:
“A Parish Clerk of an Episcopal Church at East Haddum in Connecticut, a Man of 70 Years of Age, was taken out of his Bed in a Cold Night & beat against his Hearth by Men who held him by his Arms & Legs. He was then laid across his Horse without his Clothes & drove to a considerable Distance in that naked Condition. His Nephew Dr. Abner Beebe, a Physician, complained of the bad Usage of his Uncle & spoke very freely in Favor of [the royal] Government, for which he was assaulted by a Mob, stripped naked, & hot Pitch was poured upon him, which blistered his Skin. He was then carried to an Hog Sty & rubbed over with Hog’s Dung. They threw the Hog’s Dung in his Face & rammed some of it down his Throat; & in that Condition exposed to a Company of Women. His House was attacked, his Windows broke, when one of his Children was sick, & a Child of his went into Distraction upon this Treatment. His Grist-mill was broke, & Persons prevented from grinding at it & from having any Connections with him….”
Need I say more?
We have oak, cherry, gum, honey locust (complete with thorns) tulip, holly, boxwood and pine so I am sure we can come up with something…
(We did own a chestnut but it was up north.)
I want to find all the snarky a holes who used to say things like “I guess you’re not smart enough to read a thermometer” when talking about Global Warming and slap them around a bit.
Back in 2009 / 2010 once I got a whiff of the fraud surrounding climate (so-called) science after Climategate 1.0, that’s what I thought to myself: “heck, I’m an engineer, I can read a thermometer – how tough can this be?”
It struck me one day though. It was the year of the so-called hottest March evah; when was that particular non-event? I want to say 2011. All the panics. (What the hey, Y2K!). After a few years they start to run together. But anyhow, I downloaded a rural site here in Arizona and plotted every March on record. Flat. Flat as a pancake.
For some reason, it really got to me; kind of spooked me. I mean, back in the ’70s it was settled science that global cooling from man-made particulate pollution was driving our perfect, stable, gentle, loving, planet into an ice-age. Mankind at fault. We must act now.
Then there was the “hottest March evah” – evidence of runaway Man-Made Global Warming, just you wait, sea-levels, droughts, floods, fires, disease, women and children at risk. I figured, I’d find a nice rural location where Man-Made Global Warming hadn’t yet made an appearance. I’d just scooter on over there, buy myself a little patch of dirt, and settle there if things got too, shall we say, hot.
But by looking a rural temperature data, I saw that the thermometer barely moved. Not for the imminent ice-age, not for the horror of a couple of tenths of a degree warming. Hence, I got spooked, because the stability of earth temperature, despite the clearly stated, settled, science of catastrophic cooling/heating; unquestionable, pick your decade, pick your delta T direction, there must be something else at work the climate (so-called) scientists aren’t aware of. There must be some mechanism of temperature self-regulation that simply isn’t recognized by the climate (so-called) scientists.
Think about that. A mechanism of self-regulation; a planetary negative feedback that keeps this place just nice – not too hot; not too cold. For you and for me. Lots of empirical evidence for this. Kind of a spiritual moment for me in the sense of an awe at the reality of nature here on earth; how silly we are with our panics, our futile plans to dodge physical conditions of nature. Nature is infinite compared to our puny existence. Could wipe us out, wipe us off the face of the earth SUVs or not, windmills or not.
Anyhow, still might retire out in the country. Arizona is a beautiful place. So is the entire planet; our home.
Back around 2000 I read Lovelock’s Gaia. Subsequently I found that in Boulder—where you’d hear about “Gaia” even at city council meetings on the enforcement of nuisance laws—hardly anybody knows about it, let alone read it *). Lovelock is a smart guy and he identified something quite remarkable in the planet’s self-regulation but his hypothesis of the Earth as an “organism” seemed contrived to me. It did not pass the Occam Razor test for me. Scientists of an earlier age—and hopefully still some today—found it easier to reconcile their hard scientific findings with the idea of a higher power without the need for strange new creatures like Gaia. I think Lovelock touched unwittingly on a centuries-old problem underlying our efforts to understand the world around us.
Still, I recommend reading the book. It helped me organize my own thinking about the matter.
———-
*) Unsurprisingly, the only people I met who read Gaia are the types that would never muddy up their speech with the word.
Could be a very big deal.
To see if I understand correctly:
1. Substituted values for station readings that were not captured, are by far, the reason for overall fabricated warming (for records after 1990).
2. The incidence of “missing data” (dropped/deleted/not monitored) has increased dramatically since 1990. It appears intentional.
The example(s) you’ve shown had some months missing from an otherwise continuous record.
Are they all like this? Fragments of the record missing? Or are some stations a continuous string of estimates?
Now the question is, are they being intentionally dropped? (or, are they sometimes recorded, then disappeared?) Odd for such a dramatic failure rate from non maintenance. What is their declared reason this data is dropped/missing?
Curious what is presented to, say, CRU, as raw?
I’ll bring good water for Steve and some decent beer for the rest of us.
I don’t mind starting with the beverages but my contribution was supposed to be sorted behind feathers and tar.
These WordPress geeks are not the right kind of geeks, I’m afraid.
Tar and feather piñatas! Now that’s a party!
This makes very good sense: if you are out to ‘prove’ global warming raises temperatures 7 degrees in a century you can’t leave the faking to the last minute, you’ve got to start now!