The use of anomalies and infilling cleans up the temperature record, as shown below.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Jack the Insider on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- arn on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Historic Heatwave
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Another Ice Age?
Tony, I thought you would enjoy this. I’m sure you’ve seen it already 🙂
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/josh_kansas.jpg
Hilarious! Now everyone is in!
It took me a lot of time to see the feet of the Wizard, don’t miss them! 🙂
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/29/noaas-temperature-control-knob-for-the-past-the-present-and-maybe-the-future-july-1936-now-hottest-month-again/#more-112190
I imagine “Steven Goddard” is puking as he sees this post at WUWT. While it is excellent, the irony is too thick. Real Science has been reporting this for ages, gets heavy duty criticism from WUWT, where Antony is essentially now telling the same story.
Mark 6:4
And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.”
Watts did eat some crow about his criticism of Real Science
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/28/the-scientific-method-is-at-work-on-the-ushcn-temperature-data-set/#more-112127
Watts still doesn’t seem to want to make the only logical connection. Here’s my response (held in moderation; I’m not sure I’ve ever commented there before):
Mere incompetence – artifacts of a convoluted methodology and typical bureaucratic blundering – would reasonably be expected to produce a normal distribution of error, especially given the hundreds of thousands of data points impacted.
But that’s not what we see. All of the error serves to cool the past, and to warm the present – in other words, all of the error serves to bolster the very assertion being promoted. At the micro level, as original, historic station data are being adulterated on a monthly basis, the data are modified upward or downward subtly. But at the macro level, the net adulteration always – always – serves to cool the past, and to warm the present.
It is utterly implausible that the observed error is random.
Exactly, and unbelievable that any skeptics would defend it.
I think all of this is nothing more than artifacts of a convoluted methodology and typical bureaucratic blundering.
I speculated this had its roots many years ago in semi-automated procedures back in the card-deck and tape-dataset days, before widespread use of disks (DASD or Direct Access Storage Device) when I/O operations consisted of reading in one ‘tape’, performing some operation on the data as a new tape was being written in ‘blocks’ (this is how multi-megabyte data was ‘worked’ with only say 64K or 128K of ‘core’).
There may be work procedures marked-up (ECN’d in drawing control lingo) since the 50’s describing the process; no one alive then is able to get on the ‘net today AND (note the ‘AND’) tell the story.
.
Jim,
Thanks for pointing out the new format at WUWT, even after I had already read it. 🙂
If there are ECN’s, where are they? I don’t think anything is organized in such a manner. It appears to me to be on-the-fly, and if the Boss likes the results, they go with it. There is no real V&V done. If there was, there would be a reference.
If our technical writer presented manuals without correct information on calibration procedures, maintenance schedules etc. like is done is this sloppy field known as “climate science”, I’d have been out of a job 20 years ago.
Heck I wrote up test methods for the lab and procedures for production in a number of itty bity companies with under 50 employees.