Prior to 1950, 100 degree temperatures in the midwest were very common. They almost never happen any more.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- czechlist on 100% Wind By 2030
- Jehzsa on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dearieme on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mike Peinsipp on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mac on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- mwhite on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
my understanding of long ago was that Greenhouse Gas theory was
More GHG = more cloud
More cloud = cooler days and warmer nights, effect most felt in winter (what’s not to like)
Your charts of declining maximums might be showing the effects of GHG – so long as it doesn’t drag us into an ice age, it is all good, better weather, longer growing seasons and increased C02 good for all that is growing.
There is no evidence to support that idea
1950 ~100°F
2010 ~ 97-98°F
60 year period gives around a 2°F-3°F fall.
The decline runs at about -1°F to 1.5°F per 30 years or so. That is still quite rapid, just not fast enough for most humans to ‘feel’.
~3.5°F fall over a lifespan will not be noticed.