Prior to 1950, 100 degree temperatures in the midwest were very common. They almost never happen any more.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
my understanding of long ago was that Greenhouse Gas theory was
More GHG = more cloud
More cloud = cooler days and warmer nights, effect most felt in winter (what’s not to like)
Your charts of declining maximums might be showing the effects of GHG – so long as it doesn’t drag us into an ice age, it is all good, better weather, longer growing seasons and increased C02 good for all that is growing.
There is no evidence to support that idea
1950 ~100°F
2010 ~ 97-98°F
60 year period gives around a 2°F-3°F fall.
The decline runs at about -1°F to 1.5°F per 30 years or so. That is still quite rapid, just not fast enough for most humans to ‘feel’.
~3.5°F fall over a lifespan will not be noticed.