Most of the US is cooling dramatically, and has been for 80 years. That is why NCDC and NASA make their massive downwards adjustments of the past – to hide the decline in US temperatures.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
But they are rotten temperatures. Once they are “healed”, they will look much better. Just ask gavin.
What’s clear is you didn’t use the unadjusted adjusted data. You must adapt your data. 🙂
Raw data, like raw milk is evil…it must be Gavinized, homogenized and other wise ‘ized’.
Ummm….they were hoping that no one would notice…
If you plot the minimum temperatures vs the maximum temperatures for the same records do you see the UHI signal?
At about -1°F per 30 years or so over about 80 years.
This is great info Steve. Now, if temperature variation / standard deviation is stable, and normal, and the % of 90°F days was 8% in 1880, and now it is 4.6%, we could also say that the temperature has dropped by 0.28 standard deviations. So if you calculate the std dev of those midwest temps (only the deviation from the trend) and multiply by 0.28, this should give you the number of degrees that the upper end of the temperature has dropped, all else being the same… Now you could do this again with temperatures above 80, 70, and so on and describe the movement of the distribution in another way. I think it could be another way to show that the adjustments made are totally bogus.