Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bob G on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Greg in NZ on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- conrad ziefle on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Margaret Smith on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bruce of Newcastle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on Obliterating Bill Gates
- oeman50 on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- arn on The End Of Everything
So, have you heard from Senator Inhofe’s office yet?
I seriously doubt that even Senator Inhofe is ready to hear the truth (that we ourselves have been so reluctant to admit):
The US National Academy of Sciences reviews budgets of federal research agencies for Congress to assure they promote the UN’s agenda.
That’s too bad, I was hoping it really was warming up just a little bit!
Global warming: just another term for nice weather.
And where do we find CO2 in this story ?
Time for a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judicial Watch or Mark Levin?
Steve…. is the unadjusted graph from NCDC too? I am a daily visitor to your site and appreciate the work you do! Consider me a loyal lurker!
~ 100% of postmodern consensus science, including oscillating solar neutrinos, the Standard Solar Model, Dark Energy, attractive forces between neutrons, etc., owe their existence to data tampering.
Reblogged this on Help save our kids future.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
They try really really hard to make their theory work but they just can’t do it, can they!
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
I absolutely love these tampering articles. Good show Tony.
OH LOOK!!! It’s the Politically and Intellectually Blind trying to convince the Intellectually and Politically BLIND to follow them…..WTF is this article supposed to be anyway???…ZERO explanations… just two graphs and a Headline…… Where is YOUR SCIENCE??? Do YOU actually believe you can state anything about Science without any actual SCIENCE to back up your claim and not be ridiculed???
Moron alert
It really is a shame you are unable to read a simple graph and take out your frustration by lashing out.
The rest of us here know what the graph means and new comers who do not and ask politely get polite explanations, often by me.