Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
100% Of US Warming Is Due To Data Tampering – The Ultimate Scientific Scam
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
So, have you heard from Senator Inhofe’s office yet?
I seriously doubt that even Senator Inhofe is ready to hear the truth (that we ourselves have been so reluctant to admit):
The US National Academy of Sciences reviews budgets of federal research agencies for Congress to assure they promote the UN’s agenda.
That’s too bad, I was hoping it really was warming up just a little bit!
Global warming: just another term for nice weather.
And where do we find CO2 in this story ?
Time for a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judicial Watch or Mark Levin?
Steve…. is the unadjusted graph from NCDC too? I am a daily visitor to your site and appreciate the work you do! Consider me a loyal lurker!
~ 100% of postmodern consensus science, including oscillating solar neutrinos, the Standard Solar Model, Dark Energy, attractive forces between neutrons, etc., owe their existence to data tampering.
Reblogged this on Help save our kids future.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
They try really really hard to make their theory work but they just can’t do it, can they!
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
I absolutely love these tampering articles. Good show Tony.
OH LOOK!!! It’s the Politically and Intellectually Blind trying to convince the Intellectually and Politically BLIND to follow them…..WTF is this article supposed to be anyway???…ZERO explanations… just two graphs and a Headline…… Where is YOUR SCIENCE??? Do YOU actually believe you can state anything about Science without any actual SCIENCE to back up your claim and not be ridiculed???
Moron alert
It really is a shame you are unable to read a simple graph and take out your frustration by lashing out.
The rest of us here know what the graph means and new comers who do not and ask politely get polite explanations, often by me.