100% Of US Warming Is Due To Data Tampering – The Ultimate Scientific Scam

ScreenHunter_4628 Nov. 16 08.58ScreenHunter_4629 Nov. 16 09.04

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to 100% Of US Warming Is Due To Data Tampering – The Ultimate Scientific Scam

  1. Steve Case says:

    So, have you heard from Senator Inhofe’s office yet?

    • omanuel says:

      I seriously doubt that even Senator Inhofe is ready to hear the truth (that we ourselves have been so reluctant to admit):

      The US National Academy of Sciences reviews budgets of federal research agencies for Congress to assure they promote the UN’s agenda.

  2. gregole says:

    That’s too bad, I was hoping it really was warming up just a little bit!

    Global warming: just another term for nice weather.

  3. Robertv says:

    And where do we find CO2 in this story ?

  4. annieoakley says:

    Time for a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judicial Watch or Mark Levin?

  5. Butch says:

    Steve…. is the unadjusted graph from NCDC too? I am a daily visitor to your site and appreciate the work you do! Consider me a loyal lurker!

  6. omanuel says:

    ~ 100% of postmodern consensus science, including oscillating solar neutrinos, the Standard Solar Model, Dark Energy, attractive forces between neutrons, etc., owe their existence to data tampering.

  7. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    They try really really hard to make their theory work but they just can’t do it, can they!

  8. globalcooler says:

    Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
    I absolutely love these tampering articles. Good show Tony.

  9. OH LOOK!!! It’s the Politically and Intellectually Blind trying to convince the Intellectually and Politically BLIND to follow them…..WTF is this article supposed to be anyway???…ZERO explanations… just two graphs and a Headline…… Where is YOUR SCIENCE??? Do YOU actually believe you can state anything about Science without any actual SCIENCE to back up your claim and not be ridiculed???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *