Karen Carpenter died because she made a nonsensical association between something essential (food) and something harmful.
Barack Obama is working hard to create a nonsensical association between fossil fuels and something harmful. The end game is the same. Society can’t function without an adequate energy supply.
Mitt Romney responds by supporting Obama’s euthanasia of America.
In most of the debates, Mitt would listen to hear who got
the most applause and then say he kind of agreed with
that person but not as strongly. He is a douche-bag.
Mitt doesn’t know much apparently. His big business model is not going to work much longer either. I am sure he isn’t a muslim so he has that going for him.
Mitt was always an alarmist. He merely changed his views when he ran for the presidency. Now he is just converting back
who was right “Mr. Gruder” or Karen.
There is this terrible need for the reasonable man to find some common cause with the unreasonable man. It is too often an unfortunate byproduct of attempting to maintain a Christian disposition. Love thine enemies? Thine enemies are feeding on your corpse.
Christ said love your enemies. He didn’t say agree with them.
The Christian tendency towards forgiveness and the philosophy of looking for the best in people certainly is an Achilles heel often exploited by those who are downright evil.
It is even in Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals
You can see these rules at work with how they singled out and attacked Dr Roy Spencer.
Senator Whitehouse normally uses some of the various Session’s time to discredit Dr. Spencer as a scientist with the “Creationist” question.
And then there is this attack:
Dr. Spencer after the constant baiting for years finally loses his temper and declares:
And of course because the PLAYGROUND BULLIES finally got a rise out of him after so many years they jump on it with glee.
Graham Readfearn “an astute student of climate change denialism” AT Desmogblog says:
Graham Readfearn a Brisbane-based journalist before that he worked in a pub in England.
For what it is worth I am an agnostic and therefore have no such ‘dainty Christian feelings’ that get in the way of calling a spade a spade.
Dr Spencer calls them ‘Global Warming Nazis’ I prefer to go straight for the throat and call them what they really are — Accessories to murder.
Thanks, Gail, for calling a spade a shovel.
Big Brother is demonstrating the same traits in defeat that he exhibited as delusional ruler of the world.
We must NOT respond in kind. Today our challenge is to:
1. Retain the benefits of, and
2. Eliminate the deception in
The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015
Stupid, conniving and intentional. The difference between the two at this point is that Obama wants to crash the system and Romney wants to get the votes by trying to be on both sides of the arguement. Either way the American citizens will be the loser. Keep voting for someone because they are “pro” or “anti” something and you will keep getting more of the same. There is a reason why the Democrats trot out the racism and sexism every thime they are losing power. To “gen” up the crazies out there who will vote on a single issue even if it hurts their pocket book or their rights. We are slowly losing everything. The politicians will continue to distract and divide us on issues that literally have nothing to do with our constitutional rights and our country. Divide and conquer.
Romney has no problem with crashing the system and wiping out the USA and its Constitution as long as he profits by it.
Remember it was Romney who Gruber first helped to con the masses with Romneycare. With the aid of the murderous Ted Kennedy the three of them defrauded the US tax payer so it looked like it was a viable system and President Bush went along with the fraud.
If you do not want Romney or the Twig as the next Republican nominee we need to drive home the point that the Names Romney and Bush are TOXIC!
Otherwise we are looking at 8 years of Hitlery and the final collapse of this nation into third world status.
I don’t blame Romney for trying RomneyCare. It was and is popular in that state and was worth trying as a strategy to reduce the outsized health care costs in Massachusetts. He correctly argued that the states are “laboratories of democracy”.
The problem is that the laboratory conducted the experiment, then completely ignored the results. Mass had the highest health care costs of any state before RC, and they still have the highest health care costs of any state 8 years later. And in the interim health care inflation was higher in Mass than in the rest of the country.
So, the experiment worked, the data were clear, they have just been completely ignored. It was fraudulently used as “proof of principle” for passing ObamaCare, when the opposite is true. It was actually proof that it would fail.
You are right. But understand what the lesson really is. Massachusetts high cost of healthcare is easy to understand. 50 years ago Mass was the center of what was then high tech; manufacturing, machine shops, jet engines. Their politics was also traditionally Democrat which about 50 years ago began to lean further and further left; more welfare, higher taxes, “free stuff”. This resulted in a huge influx of the dependent class and legal and illegal aliens AND a huge outflux of productive people. It was the politics of the left that crashed the Mass health care system and caused hospitals to have to close their doors. That in a nutshell is America’s future. You can see it in California and other states right now. Unfettered immigration, legal and illegal, and massive welfare and other “free stuff” that cannot be paid for is the problem. Socialized health care is just another brick in the wall it is NOT an answer. The answer? End welfare, period!
If they had listened to the right people the experiment would not have been necessary.
http://youtu.be/r5p9zYluk2o
But it seems you can’t win elections without promising ‘free’ things.
Yes, you can’t hide the source of energy[ 1,2] that sustains the Sun and continue to reap benefits from lies about that source of energy [3].
The challenge ahead is to
1. Retain the benefits and
2. End the deception in
The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015
1. Aston’s Promise & Warning (Dec 1922); CHAOS and FEAR (Aug 1945) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
2. “Solar energy,” Adv. Astronomy (submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
3. “The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Social_Experiment.pdf
My hotair comment yesterday:
It was noted by a Romney aid that Romney, while he was MA governor, was always “the [climate change] radical in the room,” insisting that man is going to cause catastrophic warming unless we take drastic action.
Then Romney flipped because he was running for the R nomination. Now for some reason Romney has flipped again: http://weaselzippers.us/211685-mitt-romney-does-the-rare-triple-flip-flop-global-warming-is-real-and-a-major-problem/
Quote:
“A growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern we can expect to see with increasing frequency, as global warming continues.” -John Holdren, 2014
Right, hot is causing it to be cold. Utterly stupid.
Hmm, John Holdren, who is that? That’s Obama’s current “Science Czar.” But surprisingly, the leftist nutcase Holdren was also Romney’s “Climate Change” Adviser.
Here are a a couple more quotes from Romney’s advisor. And these quotes would have likely been seen by Romney before he hired Holdren:
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States… [we] must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth.” -John Holdren, 1973
“Laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe.” -John Holdren, 1981
Romney is a progressive in a Republican suit.
He is & always was a Massachusetts Republican. Or, as we used to call them in the Heartland: Democrats.
Regretfully both political parties sold us out in
“The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
We must not get side-tracked trying to punish those who used grant funds to deceive the public for the past seventy years.
We should have taken President Eisenhower’s advice. So the only hope for us not is to somehow curtail or stop stop the “revolving doors” into and out of the policy-making positions (public trust) in the government(s)….into and out of the “greased” interests. A policy-maker should not be allowed to force a law upon us requiring widgets, then turn around and go to work for a widget company. The so-called “Think Tanks”, “Institutions”, and “Centers for Studies” are the conduits people are using to go to and from the revolving doors. The amount of financial interest our politicians have in Iran and in other “enemy” territories won’t even make the back page.
So much for lofty ideas….
Stop talking democrats or republicans. It is the Federal Reserve which is in power and not We The People. It is the Federal Reserve euthanizing America. It does not matter who you vote for it will not change politics. You’re screwed !
Hillary and Mitt for Prez and VP. The 2 commies go together like climate and change.
Incredible that Obama has been undeservedly bailed out economically by a shale gas revolution he had no influence on, while simultaneously doing his level best to hobble America with an astonishingly stupid energy policy.
It falls under the heading of God loves idiots.
Prince of Wales calls for climate ‘Magna Carte’ to save the planet:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/01/27/prince-of-wales-calls-for-climate-magna-carta-to-save-planet-from-global-warming/
The “contagious disease” is back. He once wished he could come back as disease and wipe out humanity. Real compassionate guy that is chock full of nuttiness.
Huh. & here I thought the Magna Carta was something which limited the power of the monarch & that was put in front of a certain king who was basically told to sign or else.
In the case of the prince, I support this idea.
You would a future king would know this stuff.
I dedicate this next beer to Prince Chuck coming back as a disease which occurs solely on the penises of baboons, & frankly the sooner the better.
Actually that was his dad, Phil. But I see where you were going there.
I think Charles had wished for something a little different, didn’t he?
Mitt Romney would have been infinitely better than Obama in either 2008 or 2012. But now the damage from the last 6+ years is so severe that Romney would be a very poor choice for President in 2016. He is too much of an establishment Republican, if not a liberal RINO, and would do a fantastic job of managing the continued decline and implosion of the country. We need someone that will change the direction of the country, not just expertly drive it further off the cliff.
If it’s a decision between Mitt and a Democrat, I think I’d rather have the Democrat at this point. At least then they own the implosion and perhaps an actual Republican could then be elected to sift through the wreckage.
KTM,
It is kind of the same in Australia. Tony Abbott, although a decent person, is not nearly “Liberal” (as in the Australian political party) enough. He is not doing enough to reverse the damage that Rudd/Gillard did. All political parties are ultimately about power over principle and so the only choice the voters get is over the speed of the car as it heads towards the cliff.
The sad thing is that best result that we can hope for is for the collectivists achieve their aims in both countries and then the mess will get so bad that a whole generation will realise the mistake and lurch (possibly violently) away from collectivism and hit the “reset” button that is so desperately required.
Steven Goddard, you provide powerful metaphors in the search for truths and responsible action. Thanks for truly understanding the dark side and being able to articulate it in a way that hits the gut — euthanasia, especially self-euthanasia.
Maybe Romney would have been better than Hussein, but I think they are both enemies of this country. I did not say that of Romney when he ran last time — and voted for him — but when I saw the kind of stupid, gutless, technologically illiterate campaign he ran (after shark attacks on other Republicans in the primary), he is an enemy. Perhaps he is more of an empty chair than the current occupant — who has laser-like malevolent intent. Romney’s candidacy must be toast, burnt to a crisp, forever and ever more.
“Karen Carpenter died because she made a nonsensical association between something essential (food) and something harmful.”
If Karen Carpenter had eaten Momma Cass’ meal, they might both be alive today 😉
How is this for a dangerous association …
http://ihrc.org.uk/activities/press-releases/11344-press-release-nominees-announced-for-islamophobia-awards-2015
From the Islamic Human Rights Commission. Maybe someone should update the Wikipedia definition of “Oxymoron” using this organisation as a prime example.
Barak Obama gets a nomination … bet he doesn’t win it though ….