No Schoolchild Has Experienced Any Global Warming During Their Lifetime

Our most accurate temperature data is from satellites, and shows that there has been no warming for almost 19 years. This means that no schoolchild on the planet has seen any global warming during their life

ScreenHunter_6128 Jan. 17 06.54 RSS TLT

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to No Schoolchild Has Experienced Any Global Warming During Their Lifetime

  1. gator69 says:

    Children just don’t know what global warming is. (sob)

  2. Gail Combs says:

    BOY, are they in for a big surprise!

    https://cbdakota.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/cycles23_24comparison2014.png?w=500&h=335

    (Green is the projected cycle 24)

    http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/solar/solar-ap-index-2014-sm.gif

    The Ap Index is a measure of geomagnetic activity from eight stations around the planet and reflects disturbances in the horizontal component of the Earth’s magnetic field. Activity for the current solar cycle has peaked at about the floor activity for the prior solar cycles back to early 1930s. – David Archibald

    Dr. David Evans The Notch-Delay Solar Theory

    There are three big drops in solar radiation in the 400 years of records. The first, in the 1600s, led to the Maunder Minimum, the coldest time in the last 400 years. The second in Napoleon’s time, led to the Dalton Minimum, the second coldest time in the last 400 years. The third started in 2004, but hasn’t led to cooling…yet. The notch-delay theory says that the fall in TSI signals a fall in force X which acts after a delay, which seems to be 11 years. So the fall will occur in 2004 + 11 = 2015. But the delay is tied to the solar cycle length, currently 13 years, so the cooling is more likely to start in 2004 + 13 = 2017. The cooling will be at least 0.2°C, maybe 0.5°C, enough to undo global warming back to the 1950s. The carbon dioxide and ND solar theories have been in agreement over the least century due to generally rising carbon dioxide and solar radiation, but now they sharply diverge. Only one of them can be correct, and soon we’ll know which one. Here’s the criterion: A fall of at least 0.1°C (on a 1-year smoothed basis) in global average surface air temperature over the next decade. If the criterion does not occur then the ND solar theory is rubbish and should be thrown away. If it does occur then the carbon dioxide theory is rubbish, and should be thrown away.

    Jo Nova said that Dr Evans is working on an update. Something new he found in the data so stay tuned.

    Willis, Lief and Anthony are not happy about the theory.

  3. renbe2010 says:

    It’s a conspiracy, almost all scientists around the world are in it, they want to take your money and your guns too!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *