Keeping an eye on Barack Obama’s Goebbel’s style propaganda campaign.
There has never been any survey or study which even remotely supports this idea. Only 52% of American Meteorological Society members believe that global warming is primarily due to humans, much less dangerous or that we can do anything about it.. I’m not aware of any survey or study which even uses the words “dangerous” or “Congress.” His claim is an outright lie, intended to smear and intimidate political opponents.
Barack Obama swore to uphold the US Constitution, which is the exact opposite of what he has done.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
He explicitly stated in 2008 that his approach is unconstitutional and illegal. He is doing the exact opposite of what his oath of office requires him to do.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BStJD_z7ehc]
The White House is not a place for a wannabee dictator or perpetual liar.
Maybe Skeeter should hire Miriam Goderich as his press secretary, since everyone seems to believe her explanations.
Did he really take The Oath?
He recited something, but what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdhrulfXib4
Good catch on the quote. Others have picked up on it.
97% of US citizens agree:
Climate change is real
Congress is dangerous
#DoNothing
Fixed it!
Not the mention that doing what he thinks is best for america is NOT part of the oath of office. And it seems to me that often he has done his best to bypass or ignore the constitution.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may
be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than
under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes
sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for
our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same
time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with
intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which
we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet
reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants,
imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
– CS Lewis
According to the Little Dictator he did not swear an oath to uphold the Constitution, but rather an oath to do what he thinks is right for the American people.
Big difference there.
Obama going to Saudi Arabia to meet with new king. Will he bow again? Shuns Israel prime minister and then meets with Arab dictator. This is whats called a clue.
http://toprightnews.com/?p=8093
What is it with Washington and the Saudis? Not just Obama but GW Bush was a great buddy to the Saudis. There are a whole bunch of US arms getting sold into Saudi Arabia and not just that, but the USA is using Saudi Arabia as a training base for “moderate” Islamists who will be the next round of militants in Syria (and just as likely turn around in a week or two and start shooting at the people who trained them).
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/16/us/syria-rebel-training/
You have to wonder whether it has occurred to anyone that this has ended very badly every other time.
It gets worse. Thanks to 9/11 the USA has the Department of Homeland Security and the TSA groping little wheelchair bound three year olds and old ladies in walkers.
What about the Saudis? 15 of the 19 Hijackers were citizens of Saudi Arabia.
28 pages were removed from the ‘Official Report’ on 9/11
So what is the Obama Admin response?
U.S. Grants Saudis ‘Trusted Traveler’ Privileges to Help Them Through Airport Security
“….The Bush administration (which, created the DHS) had its own EZ-Pass system for Saudi elites. Called “Visa Express,” it permitted Saudis to obtain U.S. visas without being photographed or having to apply in person. It was the vehicle by which three of the 9/11 hijackers gained entry to the U.S.….”
(wwwDOT)examiner.com/article/u-s-confers-ez-pass-status-on-travelers-from-saudi-arabia
To add insult to injury while Napolitano lets Saudis by-pass checks and foreigners waltz across our Southern border, She was yapping to the News Media about ‘Homegrown Terrorists’
Homeland Security: Everyone’s a Threat
What is it with Washington and the Saudis?
Do some research on the Carlyle Group.
Not to mention that while he Shunned Margret Thatcher’s funeral Obummer and Michelle Obama flew to South Africa for Nelson Mandela’s funeral. Mandela was a member of the South African Communist Party.
Not only did Obama fail to attend Margret Thatcher’s funeral he did not even send Vice President Joe Biden or Secretary of State John Kerry. Instead he sent tokens more appropriate to a third world dictator. Obama sent former Secretaries of State George Schultz and James Baker, former U.S. Ambassador to Britain Louis Susman.
In 1982, PM Margaret Thatcher sent the British military to reclaim the Falkland Islands from an Argentinean invasion. The Falklands residents voted in March 2013, to remain British by a 99.8 percent margin. However Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have sided with Argentina even calling the Falkland Islands, “The Malvinas” and Clinton in June 2012, even went so far as to say “We would like to see Argentina and the United Kingdom sit down and resolve the issues between them across the table in a peaceful, productive way.”
WTF? The issue WAS resolved by force and then by vote. CAN”T THESE FOOLS READ recent history? OR is the only reality the acknowledge the fantasies in their heads?
OH and he insulted the Queen. As the Queen’s specially invited guest at a banquet he made a speech talking over the orchestra playing God Save The Queen. This is akin to a foreign head of state talking over the Pledge of Allegiance or the US National Anthem.
Obama again insulted Great Britian by returning a bust of Sir Winston Churchill, by Sir Jacob Epstein. It was loaned to George W. Bush from the Great Britain art collection after the September 11, 2001, attacks. That same bust was returned to the British soon after Obama was elected. Great Britain offered to let Obama keep the bust for four more years, but Obama said: “Thanks, but no thanks.”
Obama also gave the Russians, the serial numbers of every Trident missile sent to Great Britain by the US. This information undermines British nuclear secrets by telling the Russians exactly how many Trident missiles Great Britain has. The information was not Obama’s to give.
That is only a partial list of Obummer’s diplomatic gaffs.
At least he admitted that is is NOT “scientists” who agree with him but “climate scientists” who are another thing all together.
Wasn’t there a science journal recently that debunked the 97% crap?
WUWT has been debunking the 97% all along.
The first survey was a simple two question survey by Doran and Zimmerman.
About that overwhelming 97-98% number of scientists that say there is a climate consensus…
1027 surveys were sent to American Geophysical Union members. (Earth Scientists)
3146 surveys were returned.
Doran and Zimmerman cherry picked a small subset — just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals. So “98% of all scientists” referred to the 75 of those 77 who answered “yes” to the second question.
Of the 3146 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question.
Note that over 6000 refused to respond to the idiotic questions.
What else did the ‘97% of scientists’ say?
(The article contains a link to the feedback comments)
Then there is Cook’s more recent 97% survey.
The 97% consensus myth – busted by a real survey
The Kiddies at SkS looked at 12,000 papers written in the last 25 years. Tossed 8000 of the papers as not taking a position. (A silent NO!)
The 97% consensus myth – busted by a real survey
The survey is titled:
And the report found that the primary reasons for answering yes were a left leaning political ideology and a belief in the supposed 97% claim.
Not only did Richard Tol and Bjørn Lomborg rip the Cook survey to shreds but so did Dr William Briggs, “Statistician to the Stars” –
And so did Psychologist José Duarte SEE: (wwwDOT)joseduarte.com/blog/more-fraud
A psychologist’s scathing review of John Cook’s ‘97% consensus’ nonsensus paper
Not to mention Brandon Shollenberger, Mike Hulme*** ?!? Shub Niggurath and Paul Homewood
Dr. Richard Tol’s draft paper on this issue,The madness of 97% 98% consensus herds
Authors are now reporting that their papers were categorized improperly:
Dr. Morner, Dr. Soon, and Dr. Carlin are classified as SUPPORTING CAGW! Good grief just the names tell you they don’t support CACA.
And finally: Cooks ‘97% consensus’ disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors
***NOTE: Hulme was an “employee of the University of East Anglia between 1988 and 2013, which included being a member of the Climatic Research Unit (1988-2000) and then the founding Director (2000-2007) of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.” Hulme was a ‘specialist’ in the Secret 28gate BBC meeting that led to censoring of skeptics.
In one of the Climategate e-mails you find:
Given all the evidence that not only is CAGW a tempest in a teapot, but that the ClimAstrologists have been lying through their teeth for years, one would think the beast would be dead and buried by now.
No wonder the Fabian/Progressives using CAGW to push their One World Dictatorship, really really want to blew skeptics to he!! and gone. We are mucking up their nice neat plans for our future enslavement.